Eddy Merckx won 525 races as a professional, a record that makes him the undisputed GOAT and sets an intimidating bar for any bike bearing his name. The previous 525 never quite cleared it. For the new 525R, the brand has started afresh, pairing deep aero profiles and a narrow cockpit with more relaxed, progressive geometry to deliver speed that more riders can use. Aero for the masses, then?Long before Eddy Merckx was a brand, The Cannibal rode frames built by Ugo De Rosa and Ernesto Colnago, with his own name already on the tubes. The company that followed has traded heavily on that legacy, but rarely on innovation. The previous 525 was a case in point: competent, unremarkable and lost in a crowd of race bikes. What you need to know about the Eddy Merckx 525R Highs progressive geometry makes an aero position easier to sustain combines aero race bike and endurance bike qualities durable CeramicSpeed SLT headset up to 34 mm tyre clearance Lows rather heavy overall, particularly the wheels at nearly 1,600 g no power meter as standard limited agility compared with some aero race bikes Key Facts 7.55 kg in size M progressive geometry with a 73 head tube angle and 75 seat tube angle in size M 55 mm deep DT Swiss ARC 1600 wheels 30 mm Continental GP 5000 S TR tyres 4ZA Nimbus Pro cockpit with 360 mm width at the hoods and 400 mm in the drops zero-setback seatpost only UDH derailleur hanger CeramicSpeed SLT headset fitted as standard lifetime warranty on the frame Until 2026, that is. Were at the legendary Rund um Kln, paying at least as much attention to the bikes on the team cars as to the race itself, when a black prototype on the Team Flanders Baloise car draws our eye. Monstrous head tube, deep tube profiles: has someone simply peeled the Ridley logos off a Noah? Not quite. The secret is soon out. This is the new Eddy Merckx 525R, a complete redesign rather than an update, and according to the brand it has the most progressive geometry on the market.The new Eddy Merckx 525R in detail: All in on aeroVisually, the 525R has very little in common with its predecessor. Massive aero profiles replace conventional tube shapes, with the broad downtube and head tube particularly striking. The resemblance to the Ridley Noah Fast is no coincidence. Both bikes emerged from Belgian Cycling Factorys in-house wind tunnel.The forks asymmetric profile is designed to improve aerodynamics.The asymmetric fork is designed to optimise airflow while providing clearance for tires up to 34 mm wide. At 7.55 kg in size M on our scales, however, the 525R is no climbing specialist. It does feature a UDH derailleur hanger and carefully chosen components, including the narrow Nimbus cockpit.The Nimbus cockpit measures just 36 cm at the hoods. And yes, our tester has already been told off for his lever angle, then again for his bar tape wrapping!Setback seatposts arent even an option.The CeramicSpeed SLT headset shows that Eddy Merckxs designers have paid attention to the details most riders will never see. Fitted as standard, the system comes with a lifetime warranty and is virtually maintenance-free according to the manufacturer. Thats a compelling feature on a bike with internal cable routing. After all, nobody wants to dismantle half the cockpit just to replace a worn headset.Eddy Merckx also have an extensive configurator, which lets you choose not just between different groupsets, but also wheels and paint finishes.The 525R comes without a power meter as standard. Normal in Eddys day, but hardly up to date now.The ARC 1600 wheels are aerodynamic, but lightweight they are not.The Eddy Merckx 525Rs spec: Deep wheels and narrow barsAt 6,999, our test bike is the most affordable 525R in the range. Shifting is taken care of by a Shimano ULTEGRA Di2 drivetrain, with 52/36 t chainrings and an 1130 t cassette, but sadly no power meter. The 170 mm cranks on our test bike in size M (56 cm) reflect the industrys steady move towards shorter crank arms. Given the geometry, though, we would have preferred 165 mm cranks to open up the hip angle even further.The 525Rs uncompromising aero concept extends to its wheels: 55 mm deep DT Swiss ARC 1600s with 30 mm Continental GP 5000 S TR tires. That said, at almost 7,000, the higher-spec ARC 1400 wheelset with aero hubs would have felt more appropriate.The 4ZA Nimbus Pro cockpit combines a width of 360 mm at the hoods with 400 mm in the drops and a 110 mm stem. The seatpost is only available with zero setback. The most conspicuous detail is whats missing: a power meter! If youre prepared to dig deeper into your pockets, the 525R is also available with a DURA-ACE groupset for 10,500 or Campagnolo Super Record for around 13,000. You can customise the frame and fork colours, too. A welcome bonus: Eddy Merckx offer a lifetime warranty on the frame.The geometry of the Eddy Merckx 525R: The anti-MerckxOne glance at the 525Rs geometry chart and you might wonder whether it should be called the anti-Merckx. Photos of The Cannibal show him with his saddle well back and his bars low. Most brands today are still busy shaving watts off the frame, but Eddy Merckx has taken a different route, putting the riders position first.SizeXSSMLTop tube length525 mm545 mm565 mm585 mmSeat tube length480 mm495 mm515 mm540 mmHead tube length125 mm140 mm160 mm185 mmHead tube angle73737373Seat tube angle74.5757576Chainstay length407 mm407 mm407 mm407 mmBottom bracket drop75 mm75 mm75 mm75 mmWheelbase964 mm990 mm1,011 mm1,043 mmReach377 mm398 mm413 mm437 mmStack535 mm550 mm569 mm593 mmThe 525Rs answer is progressive geometry. The rider sits much further forwards over the bottom bracket, opening up the hip angle. In theory, that makes it easier to lower your upper body into an aerodynamic position, but it has drawbacks for those who prefer to sit further back on the bike. Riders who like to push a big gear at a low cadence, in particular, may struggle with it.Unleash the beast!The slightly more relaxed geometry lets us ride the 525R without spacers.The recipe: a longer frame, a taller front end and steeper angles. The geometry chart lists a 73 head tube angle and a 75 seat tube angle, whereas most race bikes settle somewhere between 72 and 73 for both. Pushing the rider further forwards is central to the progressive concept, and a lower bottom bracket supports the same aim. On paper, it all looks fiercely aggressive. On the road, Eddy Merckx claims, it should feel considerably more relaxed, especially in an aero tuck.So the 525R takes a fundamentally different approach. It blends aero and endurance influences with progressive geometry, and the result is something without an obvious precedent. In theory it makes sense: a taller front end for a more sustainable aero position is the core idea of progressive geometry. But does it work in practice?The Eddy Merckx 525R on test: Aero for all?We headed to the northern Black Forest to find out whether the theory holds up on the road. Long valleys, steep climbs and fast descents were all on the agenda.The Lion of Flanders!No Flandrien test is complete without a few cobbles.The 525Rs biggest weakness? Weight. At 7.55 kg in size M, its no heavyweight, but nobody would call it light either. The wheels are the main culprit: DT Swiss claims 1,585 g for the set, including rim tape and valves, and you feel every gram when accelerating from low speed. Sprinting is a different story. Once the bike is up to speed, its aerodynamics take over.Like the Ridley Falcn RS we tested recently, the 525R lets its progressive geometry dictate the handling. Riders accustomed to a forward saddle, a long stem or similarly unorthodox adjustments will settle in immediately, since the frame delivers that position from the outset. Riders who favour a classic, rearward position will find the 525R unfamiliar. Its long reach, huge wheelbase and steep angles feel distinctly different from a conventional race bike. Perched further forwards over the bottom bracket, you gain a more open hip angle, and with it a fundamentally different pedal stroke. The force goes down through the pedals from above, not from behind, so the quadriceps take on more of the work and the glutes and hamstrings less. Anyone used to a setback seatpost should expect their legs to protest after the first ride. One thing that doesnt change is the reach to the bars: the longer front end is cancelled out by the forward saddle position. On flat roads, the position wins most riders over quickly; on climbs, the altered pedalling takes longer to accept. We felt at home almost immediately, though our usual setup was already close.The long wheelbase, above all, is a mixed blessing: it brings outstanding stability and confidence at speed, but costs the bike agility. The 525R is always easy to control, but it lacks the liveliness and razor-sharp edge of some of its aero rivals. In return, it remains composed and predictable even when things get hectic. Thats an important quality on a bike that puts so much weight over the front wheel. Another highlight is the 30 mm Continental GP 5000 S TR tires. They offer excellent grip, once again confirming their status as some of our all-time favourites.The 525R is fast. Seriously fast. Yet its full potential only emerges once a rider is on board. The aero profiles and 55 mm deep DT Swiss wheels keep drag low and deliver a noticeable sailing effect, but the real trump card is the riding position. A low front end may look aerodynamic, but what use is it if your back starts aching after 10 minutes? Theres a reason spacers under the extensions are increasingly common, even in time trials: a position needs to be fast, but above all it needs to be sustainable. Many riders also know the feeling of losing power the moment they tuck down. The taller front end and more open hip angle aim to minimise exactly that, mirroring a trend among time triallists, whose positions are moving ever further forwards and upwards. In practice, it works, at least for us: we lose less power when we bend our elbows. How much difference it makes, however, depends heavily on the individual.Fast enough to get you a ticket!The 525R isnt a fan of 30 km/h zones.This is exactly where the 525R comes in. The taller stack and forward saddle position create a long, high riding position with an open hip angle. With the hoods just 36 cm apart, its easy to bend your elbows. The result is an aero position thats surprisingly easy to hold, without folding yourself in half. Road time trials ridden without time trial bikes are known as Merckx-style time trials. And thats precisely where we see the 525Rs greatest strength.The aero position is more comfortable, but you can still make yourself suffer especially on the climbs.When it comes to compliance, the 525R remains a typical aero bike. The broad seatpost offers little flex, and the frame only takes the edge off bumps to a limited extent. Once again, the 525R finds its comfort in ergonomics. Its slightly more relaxed geometry already makes it more accessible than many uncompromising aero racers. Combined with the more open hip angle, it could even allow riders with limited flexibility to achieve a genuinely aerodynamic position on an aero bike for the first time. Tuning tip: Fit a power meter so you can see how many watts you save with the new position.Who is the Eddy Merckx 525R the right bike for?The 525R is particularly appealing if you want to ride fast without putting up with an extremely low, uncomfortable position. The progressive yet comparatively relaxed geometry fills an interesting gap between uncompromising aero race bikes and endurance bikes. If you prefer traditional geometry or sit further back on the bike, the 525R wont be for you. But if you want to ride in an aero position and havent been able to make it work so far, this bike could be the answer.Helmet Giro Eclipse Pro Spherical | Glasses Oakley VeloKato | Jersey ASSOS EQUIPE THERMOBOOSTER P1 | Shorts Q36.5 Dottore Pro | Shoes Specialized S-Works Torch | Socks FALKE BC ImpulseConclusions about the Eddy Merckx 525RFor the right rider, the Eddy Merckx 525R could mark a turning point for aero bikes. Instead of simply making the frame faster, it puts the rider at the centre of the equation, using progressive geometry to create an aero position you can hold for longer and bridging the gap between race bike and endurance machine. On fast, flat roads, it impresses with its efficiency and stability. Its weight and limited agility take some of the shine off, but for riders who struggle to stay low, the 525R makes aero speed more accessible than almost any race bike weve tested.TopsProgressive geometry makes an aero position easier to sustainCombines aero racer and endurance bike qualitiesDurable CeramicSpeed SLT headsetFlopsRather heavy overall, and particularly the wheels at nearly 1,600 gNo power meter as standardFor more information, visit eddymerckx.com.Der Beitrag Eddy Merckx 525R 2026 Review: Cannibal Speed for the Rest of Us erschien zuerst auf GRAN FONDO Cycling Magazine.

Eddy Merckx won 525 races as a professional, a record that makes him the undisputed GOAT and sets an intimidating bar for any bike bearing his name. The previous 525 never quite cleared it. For the new 525R, the brand has started afresh, pairing deep aero profiles and a narrow cockpit with more relaxed, progressive geometry to deliver speed that more riders can use. Aero for the masses, then?Long before Eddy Merckx was a brand, The Cannibal rode frames built by Ugo De Rosa and Ernesto Colnago, with his own name already on the tubes. The company that followed has traded heavily on that legacy, but rarely on innovation. The previous 525 was a case in point: competent, unremarkable and lost in a crowd of race bikes.Until 2026, that is. Were at the legendary Rund um Kln, paying at least as much attention to the bikes on the team cars as to the race itself, when a black prototype on the Team Flanders Baloise car draws our eye. Monstrous head tube, deep tube profiles: has someone simply peeled the Ridley logos off a Noah? Not quite. The secret is soon out. This is the new Eddy Merckx 525R, a complete redesign rather than an update, and according to the brand it has the most progressive geometry on the market.The new Eddy Merckx 525R in detail: All in on aeroVisually, the 525R has very little in common with its predecessor. Massive aero profiles replace conventional tube shapes, with the broad downtube and head tube particularly striking. The resemblance to the Ridley Noah Fast is no coincidence. Both bikes emerged from Belgian Cycling Factorys in-house wind tunnel.The forks asymmetric profile is designed to improve aerodynamics.The asymmetric fork is designed to optimise airflow while providing clearance for tires up to 34 mm wide. At 7.55 kg in size M on our scales, however, the 525R is no climbing specialist. It does feature a UDH derailleur hanger and carefully chosen components, including the narrow Nimbus cockpit.The Nimbus cockpit measures just 36 cm at the hoods. And yes, our tester has already been told off for his lever angle, then again for his bar tape wrapping!Setback seatposts arent even an option.The CeramicSpeed SLT headset shows that Eddy Merckxs designers have paid attention to the details most riders will never see. Fitted as standard, the system comes with a lifetime warranty and is virtually maintenance-free according to the manufacturer. Thats a compelling feature on a bike with internal cable routing. After all, nobody wants to dismantle half the cockpit just to replace a worn headset.Eddy Merckx also have an extensive configurator, which lets you choose not just between different groupsets, but also wheels and paint finishes.The 525R comes without a power meter as standard. Normal in Eddys day, but hardly up to date now.The ARC 1600 wheels are aerodynamic, but lightweight they are not.The Eddy Merckx 525Rs spec: Deep wheels and narrow barsAt 6,999, our test bike is the most affordable 525R in the range. Shifting is taken care of by a Shimano ULTEGRA Di2 drivetrain, with 52/36 t chainrings and an 1130 t cassette, but sadly no power meter. The 170 mm cranks on our test bike in size M (56 cm) reflect the industrys steady move towards shorter crank arms. Given the geometry, though, we would have preferred 165 mm cranks to open up the hip angle even further.Eddy Merckx 525R 2027 6,999SpecificationsSeatpost 525R 7E9 ****Brakes Shimano Ultegra160/140 mmDrivetrain SHIMANO Ultegra Di2 2 x 12Chainring 52/36 TStem 4ZA Nimbus Pro 7E8 110 mmHandlebar 4ZA Nimbus Pro 7E8 360 mmWheelset DT Swiss ARC 1600 55 12 x 100 / 12 x 142Tires Continental GP 5000 S TR 700 x 30cCranks Shimano Ultegra 170 mmCassette SHIMANO Ultegra Di2 10-30TTechnical DataSize XS S M LWeight 7,55 kgThe 525Rs uncompromising aero concept extends to its wheels: 55 mm deep DT Swiss ARC 1600s with 30 mm Continental GP 5000 S TR tires. That said, at almost 7,000, the higher-spec ARC 1400 wheelset with aero hubs would have felt more appropriate.The 4ZA Nimbus Pro cockpit combines a width of 360 mm at the hoods with 400 mm in the drops and a 110 mm stem. The seatpost is only available with zero setback. The most conspicuous detail is whats missing: a power meter! If youre prepared to dig deeper into your pockets, the 525R is also available with a DURA-ACE groupset for 10,500 or Campagnolo Super Record for around 13,000. You can customise the frame and fork colours, too. A welcome bonus: Eddy Merckx offer a lifetime warranty on the frame.The geometry of the Eddy Merckx 525R: The anti-MerckxOne glance at the 525Rs geometry chart and you might wonder whether it should be called the anti-Merckx. Photos of The Cannibal show him with his saddle well back and his bars low. Most brands today are still busy shaving watts off the frame, but Eddy Merckx has taken a different route, putting the riders position first.SizeXSSMLTop tube length525 mm545 mm565 mm585 mmSeat tube length480 mm495 mm515 mm540 mmHead tube length125 mm140 mm160 mm185 mmHead tube angle73737373Seat tube angle74.5757576Chainstay length407 mm407 mm407 mm407 mmBottom bracket drop75 mm75 mm75 mm75 mmWheelbase964 mm990 mm1,011 mm1,043 mmReach377 mm398 mm413 mm437 mmStack535 mm550 mm569 mm593 mmThe 525Rs answer is progressive geometry. The rider sits much further forwards over the bottom bracket, opening up the hip angle. In theory, that makes it easier to lower your upper body into an aerodynamic position, but it has drawbacks for those who prefer to sit further back on the bike. Riders who like to push a big gear at a low cadence, in particular, may struggle with it.Unleash the beast!The slightly more relaxed geometry lets us ride the 525R without spacers.The recipe: a longer frame, a taller front end and steeper angles. The geometry chart lists a 73 head tube angle and a 75 seat tube angle, whereas most race bikes settle somewhere between 72 and 73 for both. Pushing the rider further forwards is central to the progressive concept, and a lower bottom bracket supports the same aim. On paper, it all looks fiercely aggressive. On the road, Eddy Merckx claims, it should feel considerably more relaxed, especially in an aero tuck.So the 525R takes a fundamentally different approach. It blends aero and endurance influences with progressive geometry, and the result is something without an obvious precedent. In theory it makes sense: a taller front end for a more sustainable aero position is the core idea of progressive geometry. But does it work in practice?The Eddy Merckx 525R on test: Aero for all?We headed to the northern Black Forest to find out whether the theory holds up on the road. Long valleys, steep climbs and fast descents were all on the agenda.The Lion of Flanders!No Flandrien test is complete without a few cobbles.The 525Rs biggest weakness? Weight. At 7.55 kg in size M, its no heavyweight, but nobody would call it light either. The wheels are the main culprit: DT Swiss claims 1,585 g for the set, including rim tape and valves, and you feel every gram when accelerating from low speed. Sprinting is a different story. Once the bike is up to speed, its aerodynamics take over.Like the Ridley Falcn RS we tested recently, the 525R lets its progressive geometry dictate the handling. Riders accustomed to a forward saddle, a long stem or similarly unorthodox adjustments will settle in immediately, since the frame delivers that position from the outset. Riders who favour a classic, rearward position will find the 525R unfamiliar. Its long reach, huge wheelbase and steep angles feel distinctly different from a conventional race bike. Perched further forwards over the bottom bracket, you gain a more open hip angle, and with it a fundamentally different pedal stroke. The force goes down through the pedals from above, not from behind, so the quadriceps take on more of the work and the glutes and hamstrings less. Anyone used to a setback seatpost should expect their legs to protest after the first ride. One thing that doesnt change is the reach to the bars: the longer front end is cancelled out by the forward saddle position. On flat roads, the position wins most riders over quickly; on climbs, the altered pedalling takes longer to accept. We felt at home almost immediately, though our usual setup was already close.The long wheelbase, above all, is a mixed blessing: it brings outstanding stability and confidence at speed, but costs the bike agility. The 525R is always easy to control, but it lacks the liveliness and razor-sharp edge of some of its aero rivals. In return, it remains composed and predictable even when things get hectic. Thats an important quality on a bike that puts so much weight over the front wheel. Another highlight is the 30 mm Continental GP 5000 S TR tires. They offer excellent grip, once again confirming their status as some of our all-time favourites.The 525R is fast. Seriously fast. Yet its full potential only emerges once a rider is on board. The aero profiles and 55 mm deep DT Swiss wheels keep drag low and deliver a noticeable sailing effect, but the real trump card is the riding position. A low front end may look aerodynamic, but what use is it if your back starts aching after 10 minutes? Theres a reason spacers under the extensions are increasingly common, even in time trials: a position needs to be fast, but above all it needs to be sustainable. Many riders also know the feeling of losing power the moment they tuck down. The taller front end and more open hip angle aim to minimise exactly that, mirroring a trend among time triallists, whose positions are moving ever further forwards and upwards. In practice, it works, at least for us: we lose less power when we bend our elbows. How much difference it makes, however, depends heavily on the individual.Fast enough to get you a ticket!The 525R isnt a fan of 30 km/h zones.This is exactly where the 525R comes in. The taller stack and forward saddle position create a long, high riding position with an open hip angle. With the hoods just 36 cm apart, its easy to bend your elbows. The result is an aero position thats surprisingly easy to hold, without folding yourself in half. Road time trials ridden without time trial bikes are known as Merckx-style time trials. And thats precisely where we see the 525Rs greatest strength.The aero position is more comfortable, but you can still make yourself suffer especially on the climbs.When it comes to compliance, the 525R remains a typical aero bike. The broad seatpost offers little flex, and the frame only takes the edge off bumps to a limited extent. Once again, the 525R finds its comfort in ergonomics. Its slightly more relaxed geometry already makes it more accessible than many uncompromising aero racers. Combined with the more open hip angle, it could even allow riders with limited flexibility to achieve a genuinely aerodynamic position on an aero bike for the first time. Tuning tip: Fit a power meter so you can see how many watts you save with the new position.Who is the Eddy Merckx 525R the right bike for?The 525R is particularly appealing if you want to ride fast without putting up with an extremely low, uncomfortable position. The progressive yet comparatively relaxed geometry fills an interesting gap between uncompromising aero race bikes and endurance bikes. If you prefer traditional geometry or sit further back on the bike, the 525R wont be for you. But if you want to ride in an aero position and havent been able to make it work so far, this bike could be the answer.Helmet Giro Eclipse Pro Spherical | Glasses Oakley VeloKato | Jersey ASSOS EQUIPE THERMOBOOSTER P1 | Shorts Q36.5 Dottore Pro | Shoes Specialized S-Works Torch | Socks FALKE BC ImpulseConclusions about the Eddy Merckx 525RFor the right rider, the Eddy Merckx 525R could mark a turning point for aero bikes. Instead of simply making the frame faster, it puts the rider at the centre of the equation, using progressive geometry to create an aero position you can hold for longer and bridging the gap between race bike and endurance machine. On fast, flat roads, it impresses with its efficiency and stability. Its weight and limited agility take some of the shine off, but for riders who struggle to stay low, the 525R makes aero speed more accessible than almost any race bike weve tested.TopsProgressive geometry makes an aero position easier to sustainCombines aero racer and endurance bike qualitiesDurable CeramicSpeed SLT headsetFlopsRather heavy overall, and particularly the wheels at nearly 1,600 gNo power meter as standardFor more information, visit eddymerckx.com.Der Beitrag Eddy Merckx 525R 2026 Review: Cannibal Speed for the Rest of Us erschien zuerst auf GRAN FONDO Cycling Magazine.

Protective shell or fashion statement? Whats the best laptop backpack for your needs? We took a close look at eleven models to help you decide: which one really protects your hardware and still looks good while doing so? Our Laptop Backpack Review 2026 has all the answers. Platform 4, the morning rush, and a sprint for the green light: a laptop backpack isnt just a bag its our mobile HQ. In a world between home office, coworking space, and our favorite bar, the line between private life and work keeps blurring. We live somewhere in between, always on the move, always switching gears and we need gear that can keep up. A laptop backpack has to be practical as an everyday companion, comfortable to carry, and capable of protecting our mission-critical hardware. But pure function stopped being enough a long time ago. Wheres the aesthetic? Who wants to show up to a business lunch with a crumpled hiking backpack?Thats where things get interesting. Between clean office style, technical armor, and a fashion statement lie entire worlds and thats exactly what we focused on for this review. What concept actually works in everyday life? Which laptop backpack fits which lifestyle, and which solution is best for whom? No worries, weve got your back. For our Laptop Backpack Review, we selected eleven models priced between 85 and 360. And one thing upfront: a lot of them nailed that balancing act, and genuinely surprised and impressed us. Just take a look Laptop Backpack Review 2026 These 11 Models Are InManufacturerModelPrice (MSRPin)Volume/lMax. Laptop Compartment Sizeaunts & uncles Kushiro RERead Review229,9526,515Brooks Pickwick Leather 26LRead Review360,002616DeuterDrout 20Read Review170,002016EVOCUrban Pack 25Read Review150,002515GOT BAGRolltop Lite 2.0Read Review149,002616Kapten & SonLisbon SmallRead Review139,901714OrtliebCommuter-Daypack Urban 21LRead Review180,002115,4Peak DesignEveryday DaypackRead Review299,9920251516TatonkaGrip Rolltop Pack 25 KapokRead Review85,002016VAUDEMineo 23 DaypackRead Review110,002315,6YETIRanchero 22L Everyday Carry BackpackRead Review230,002215Curious? Head over to our sister mag DOWNTOWN for the test results and our buying advice: find out which model is right for you!More backpacks and bike bags reviewed at DOWNTOWN:Urban all-round backpack: AEVOR Trip PackCommuter backpack with back protector: EVOC COMMUTE Pro 22Stylish bicycle briefcase: New Loox Leather FelliniDer Beitrag Laptop Backpack Review 2026 11 Models Between Office Chic and 80s Briefcase Vibes erschien zuerst auf GRAN FONDO Cycling Magazine.

Wide, stiff and affordable, the AG48 sees Light Bicycle bring ultra-wide carbon rims from its own factory in China to the gravel racing scene. Our custom-built test wheelset has the lowest starting price in the test, though the final bill ends up somewhat higher. The question is whether a direct-to-consumer wheelset can take on the established brands in our big gravel wheel group test.This wheelset was tested as part of our big 2026 gravel wheel group test you can find an overview of all the wheels on test here.Light Bicycle AG48 | 1,481 g | 993.64 plus import | Manufacturer websiteBased in Chinas Fujian province, Light Bicycle have been manufacturing carbon rims since 2011, selling both rims and custom-configured wheelsets direct to customers. The AG48 has been available since May 2026, and Light Bicycle claims nothing less than that its the fastest gravel wheelset ever made. Its ultra-wide rims are designed for tires of at least 44 mm, with Light Bicycle recommending 45 mm as the ideal match. As the only direct-to-consumer wheelset in the test, the AG48 also enters with by far the lowest starting price.Direct from China The Light Bicycle Carbon Gravel Wheelset in DetailWidth is clearly the name of the game for Light Bicycle. At 48 mm deep and with a massive 35 mm internal width, the AG48 rims are the widest in the entire test field alongside the ENVE. The external width, however, is just 40 mm. As a result, our 45 mm Continental Competition control tire expands to 49 mm, overhanging the rim sidewalls noticeably, though without any ill effect on handling. The hybrid-hook design is approved for tires between 44 and 55 mm, with a maximum pressure of 3.79 bar when running 45 mm tires. At 1,481 g on our scales, the AG48 wheelset sits in the middle of the pack for weight. Light Bicycle dont specify a weight for the complete wheelset, although they claim 460 g for each rim.Ultra-wide With a 35 mm internal rim width, the 45 mm Continental Competition tire grows to 49 mm.Hybrid Hook With 45 mm tires, the rims are approved for pressures of up to 3.79 bar.No paint The unpainted UD carbon has a clean, understated look and is intended to save weight.Hubs and spokes are left to the customer. Our test wheelset pairs Light Bicycles in-house Pace hubs, running on steel bearings with a 48-tooth ratchet, with 24 black Sapim CX-Ray steel spokes per wheel. The freehub makes no secret of its presence, a fitting soundtrack for a wheelset with racing ambitions.In the configuration we tested, the wheelset costs 993.64, though thats not the final price. Shipping, import VAT and customs duties all come on top of that. Ordering, delivery and any potential warranty claims also have to be handled directly with the manufacturer, which makes the process more complicated than buying from a German or European retailer. However, a planned EU shop with a warehouse in France should make things easier.Light Bicycle offer a five-year warranty on the rims, which you can upgrade to lifetime cover for an additional charge, along with a crash replacement programme offering a 25% discount.Made to measure Light Bicycle let you configure the hubs, spokes and components to suit your preferences.Loud and clear With its 48-tooth ratchet, the Pace hub sounds every bit the racer.Thoroughbred Racer The Light Bicycle AG48 on TestThe AG48 doesnt just look the part on our test route. High stiffness gives it powerful acceleration, converting every pedal stroke straight into forward momentum, and its correspondingly quick on the straights, even without a noticeable sail effect.Through corners, that stiffness, combined with low crosswind sensitivity, makes it easy to control and precise at holding a line. Comfort is the price. On trails, it can get a little unsettled and demands a firm hand.That sets it apart from all-rounders like the Roval. The AG48 is a pure racing wheelset, and it wont suit every rider or every ride. For those who put outright speed first and enjoy a lively racer, though, its a lot of fun.The Fastest Ever? The Light Bicycle AG48 in our Wind TunnelThe AG48 certainly feels like a racing wheel out on the course. But can it deliver on Light Bicycles bold claim of being the fastest gravel wheelset ever made?On the road, the AG48 feels quick, though it shows no noticeable sail effect, and crosswinds barely trouble it despite the relatively narrow external rim width. The wind tunnel largely backs up those impressions. With a rider on board at 36 km/h, the AG48 needs 1.1 W less than our DT Swiss GRC 1100 reference wheelset, a 7.6-second advantage over 40 km. That margin sits within the measurement tolerance, however, so the fastest gravel wheelset ever made it is not.Light Bicycles ambitious claim doesnt hold up in our testing, though neither does the AG48 show any aerodynamic weakness. The tire offers a possible explanation. Because we always test wheel and tire as a complete system, the 49 mm Continental Competition, which sits well proud of the 40 mm external rim width, forms part of the measured result.Conclusions about the Light Bicycle AG48Value is the Light Bicycle AG48s trump card. High stiffness, strong acceleration and ultra-wide rims make it a convincing budget racer, and youre free to choose your own hubs and spokes. Comfort and rough-terrain composure are the compromises, and importing direct from China takes more effort than a trip to your local bike shop. But for 993.64, plus shipping, import VAT and customs duties, it delivers serious racing performance to riders prepared to do the extra legwork, both before the ride and during it.TopsExceptionally low starting priceHigh stiffness and powerful accelerationUltra-wide rimsCustomisable configurationFlopsLimited comfort on rough terrainAdditional import costs and hassleMore information at lightbicycle.com.The Test FieldThis wheelset was tested as part of our big 2026 gravel wheel group test you can find an overview of all the wheels on test here.All wheels on test: CADEX Max GXR | DT Swiss GRC 1100 DICUT 50 | ENVE G SES 6.7 Pro | Fulcrum Sharq GR | HUNT 5AM Gravel Limitless Ti_UD | Leeze CH 60 PRO GX | Light Bicycle AG48 | NEWMEN Streem G.62 CS | OQUO RP50LTD CS | Reserve 48|53 GR | Roval Terra Aero CLX | Vision SC 45 i30 | Zipp 303 XPLR SWDer Beitrag Light Bicycle AG48 Gravel Wheelset on Test erschien zuerst auf GRAN FONDO Cycling Magazine.

Heavy, narrow and built with Swiss precision, the GRC 1100 DICUT 50 sees DT Swiss bring a proven classic to the fight for gravel honors. Conventional hooked rims, steel spokes and DT 180 hubs make the case that great wheels neednt chase every trend. The question is whether that tried-and-tested formula can compete with the latest generation in our big gravel wheel group test.This wheelset was tested as part of our big 2026 gravel wheel group test you can find an overview of all the wheels on test here.DT Swiss GRC 1100 DICUT 50 | 1,608 g | 2,499 | Manufacturer websiteFew names carry as much weight in hub design as DT Swiss, whose DT 180 hubs appear on several other wheelsets in this test. On the road, the brands ERC 1100 surprised us with its aerodynamics in our big 2024 carbon wheel group test, and the GRC 1100 DICUT 50 brings that philosophy to gravel. Conventional 50 mm deep hooked rims and a focus on durability and ride quality take priority over record-breaking specs. The wheelset also has a special role here: as our wind tunnel reference, its the benchmark every other wheelset is measured against.Swiss Precision The DT Swiss Carbon Gravel Wheelset in DetailDT Swiss have built the GRC 1100 DICUT 50 to last rather than to impress on the scales, and at 1,608 g, its the heaviest wheelset in the test. The rims are 50 mm deep and 36.5 mm wide externally, but their 24 mm internal width is the narrowest in the field. As a result, our 45 mm Continental Competition control tire barely changes shape, measuring 44.9 mm at the front and 44.8 mm at the rear. Conventional hooked rims approved for tires from 29 to 65 mm make it one of the most versatile wheelsets in the test when it comes to tire choice.Hooked up Conventional bead hooks allow tyre widths between 29 and 65 mm.Narrow profile With a 24 mm internal rim width, the 45 mm tyre stays almost exactly true to its nominal dimensions.Silver lining The understated design features subtle silver decals that add just a touch of contrast.Each wheel uses 24 of DT Swisss own Aerolite II steel spokes, laced to DT Swiss 180 hubs with Ratchet EXP, 36 points of engagement and SINC ceramic bearings, and the freehub makes its familiar, clearly audible DT Swiss buzz. Understated yet surprisingly stylish, with a distinctive rim profile and particularly attractive hubs, its our favorite wheelset in the test on looks alone. Technologically, the 2024 model is no longer the newest design here, but at 2,499, it sits mid-field on price. Beyond the statutory warranty, DT Swiss offer original owners 10 years of Fair-Share crash replacement cover, with replacement wheels at 249 each.The heart of the wheel The DT Swiss 180 hub with Ratchet EXP and ceramic bearings is tried and tested, although its hardly silent.Shaped steel The 24 Aerolite II spokes per wheel are conventional and straightforward to replace.Effortlessly Quick The DT Swiss GRC 1100 DICUT 50 on TestOur test route quickly reveals a surprise. Given its weight and age, the DT Swiss accelerates with unexpected eagerness and proves thoroughly enjoyable to ride. It cant quite match the responsiveness of the carbon-spoked competition, and you certainly notice its weight on the climbs. Stiffness, however, is almost perfectly tuned to the wheelsetsintended use, although a little more would give them an extra kick when accelerating.In corners, the DT Swiss wheels feel composed, confidence-inspiring and more direct than the other steel-spoked wheels in the test, particularly the considerably more passive Fulcrum. Comfort is well balanced on normal gravel. However, once the terrain gets rougher, the DT Swiss reveal their weakness. On trails, they feel harsh, transmitting impacts directly to the rider and becoming noticeably more unsettled. The relatively narrow tyre profile contributes to this behaviour. Overall, they remain a balanced, understated and almost perfectly executed wheelset, held back primarily by their acceleration and harshness on rough trails.Benchmark or Mid-Pack? The DT Swiss GRC 1100 DICUT 50 in the Wind TunnelLively on the course, the DT Swiss raises an obvious question: how aerodynamic is the reference wheelset itself? On feel, more than we expected. Its deep rims and distinctive profile seem to work well together, and it rides like an efficient wheelset that sits comfortably mid-field. In the wind tunnel, it sets the zero baseline for every other wheelset, and few rivals beat it by a significant margin, with almost the entire field falling within the measurement tolerance. That an older design still holds its own against newer ones is perhaps the most remarkable finding. The tire may play a part. Because we measure wheel and tire as a complete system, the narrow rims give the Continental Competition a particularly compact profile.Conclusions about the DT Swiss GRC 1100 DICUT 50The DT Swiss GRC 1100 DICUT 50 sets the benchmark in our test field, and not only in the wind tunnel. Balanced, predictable handling and an uncomplicated ride make it easy to live with, and surprisingly lively acceleration, proven DT Swiss technology with ceramic bearings and a clean, premium look make the package hard to argue with. Rough trails expose its limits, where it feels harsh and its weight makes itself felt. For riders who value durability over passing trends, though, 2,499 buys a tried-and-tested carbon gravel wheelset that never misses a beat.TopsBalanced, predictable handlingSurprisingly lively for their weightProven DT Swiss 180 technology with ceramic bearingsUnderstated, premium appearanceFlopsHeaviest wheelset in the testVery harsh on rough trailsMore information at dtswiss.de.The Test FieldThis wheelset was tested as part of our big 2026 gravel wheel group test you can find an overview of all the wheels on test here.All wheels on test: CADEX Max GXR | DT Swiss GRC 1100 DICUT 50 | ENVE G SES 6.7 Pro | Fulcrum Sharq GR | HUNT 5AM Gravel Limitless Ti_UD | Leeze CH 60 PRO GX | Light Bicycle AG48 | NEWMEN Streem G.62 CS | OQUO RP50LTD CS | Reserve 48|53 GR | Roval Terra Aero CLX | Vision SC 45 i30 | Zipp 303 XPLR SWDer Beitrag DT Swiss GRC 1100 DICUT 50 Gravel Wheelset on Test erschien zuerst auf GRAN FONDO Cycling Magazine.

Deep, wide and made in Germany: with the Streem G.62 CS, NEWMEN bring 62 mm deep, 45 mm wide carbon rims to gravel racing at one of the lowest prices in the test. An optional concealed aero valve promises to squeeze out every last watt. But can this all-out racing approach take the wheelset to the top of our big gravel wheel group test?This wheelset was tested as part of our big 2026 gravel wheel group test you can find an overview of all the wheels on test here.NEWMEN Streem G.62 CS | 1,526 g | 1,690 | Manufacturer websiteBased in Germanys Allgu region, NEWMEN have long made a name for themselves with lightweight hubs and wheels, and the CS version of the Streem G.62 is even manufactured in Germany. Its rims are designed specifically for tires from 45 to 50 mm wide, combining a 62 mm depth with an exceptionally wide external profile. Together with the ENVE G SES 6.7 Pro, it represents one of the most radical aerodynamic concepts in the test, although it sits in a completely different price bracket. Out on the course, it quickly reveals itself as a true racing machine.Deep-Section Performance at a Bargain Price The NEWMEN Carbon Gravel Wheelset in DetailThe NEWMEN Streem G.62 CS makes no compromises when it comes to aerodynamics. Both rims are 62 mm deep, making it the deepest in this test field, while its 45 mm external width also places it among the widest. Despite those substantial dimensions, the NEWMEN keeps its weight reasonably low at 1,526 g on our scales, compared with the manufacturers claimed 1,530 g. Internal rim width is a more moderate 27 mm, with our 45 mm Continental Competition control tire measuring 46.2 mm at the front and 46.1 mm at the rear. The conventional hooked rims are optimised for tires between 45 and 50 mm wide and approved for a maximum system weight of 130 kg.Going deep At 62 mm deep front and rear, no other wheelset in the test has deeper rims.Hide and seek The optional concealed valve disappears into the rim profile but makes everyday use considerably more complicated.Everyday headache The special valve looks clean, but the additional accessories make it unnecessarily awkward to live with.NEWMEN use 21 Vonoa Aerowide carbon spokes per wheel, laced to slim Fade-R hubs. These use a three-pawl mechanism with 36 points of engagement, which ensures a pleasantly quiet freehub. But thats not the only unconventional feature. NEWMENs proprietary Streem valve system allows their Schrader-type tubeless valve to be hidden inside the rim. To inflate the tire or check its pressure, youll need a special adapter that connects to the valve through an opening in the rim. According to NEWMEN, the main benefit is improved aerodynamics. We rode both valve configurations, and both work. However, the conventional valve is clearly the better choice for everyday riding. It lets you adjust tire pressure without fiddling around with adapters, replacement parts are readily available, and you wont need to carry an extra attachment in your jersey pocket in case of a puncture. At 1,690, the NEWMEN are among the most affordable wheels in the test. The Streem G.62 are also available with steel spokes for just 1,390. Both versions come with a three-year warranty and a lifetime, transferable crash replacement programme offering a 50% discount on the recommended retail price.Vonoa inside The 21 carbon spokes per wheel deliver high stiffness and a genuine racing aesthetic.Slim profile The Fade-R hub with its three-pawl mechanism is lightweight and pleasantly quiet.Racing Machine The NEWMEN Streem G.62 CS on TestOut on our test route, the NEWMEN quickly proves its built for speed. Subjectively, its the most efficient wheelset in the test. Its wide, deep rims seem to deliver a noticeable extra push, and its the only wheelset that helped us set several personal bests and even claim a few KOMs. Stiffness is clearly tuned for racing, making acceleration feel direct and purposeful. The Streem G.62 CS turns every effort into forward momentum and feels particularly convincing when youre pushing hard.Its handling strikes an excellent balance between precision and control. It responds quickly to steering inputs without feeling nervous, making it well suited to fast gravel riding, and it stays composed through corners while rewarding an assertive riding style. The trade-off is compliance. On rougher surfaces, the stiff construction transmits more impacts than the most comfortable wheelsets in the test. For riders who prioritize speed and responsive handling, however, the NEWMEN delivers a highly convincing racing experience.Feeling Versus Stopwatch? The NEWMEN Streem G.62 CS in the Wind TunnelOn the course, the NEWMEN feels like the fastest wheelset in the test. But does the wind tunnel confirm that impression? The answer is surprisingly disappointing. With a rider on board at 36 km/h, the NEWMEN requires 0.1 W more than our reference wheelset, the DT Swiss GRC 1100, a 0.9-second disadvantage over 40 km, though well within the measurement tolerance. Its high stiffness may explain the discrepancy: a direct, responsive wheelset feels fast on the road, whereas the wind tunnel measures aerodynamic drag alone. The concealed aero valve offers no measurable advantage either. Tested without a rider, the conventional valve configuration performed marginally better than NEWMENs proprietary solution. The difference is negligible, leaving the aero valve looking like a complicated answer to a problem that doesnt exist, and one that adds unnecessary hassle to everyday riding.Conclusions about the NEWMEN Streem G.62 CSThe NEWMEN Streem G.62 CS are genuine racing wheels, with deep, wide rims that deliver a direct, efficient ride and encourage you to chase new personal bests. Their handling hits the sweet spot for gravel, while the substantial rims and silver decals create a striking racing aesthetic. Youll have to accept a compromise in compliance, however, and the concealed aero valve offers no measurable advantage. At 1,690, the NEWMEN Streem G.62 CS delivers pure racing performance for comparatively little money.TopsSubjectively the fastest wheels in the testHandling hits the sweet spot for gravelPlenty of racing performance at a fair priceMade in GermanyFlopsLimited compliance on rough terrainNo measurable benefit from the aero valveMore information at newmen-components.de.The Test FieldThis wheelset was tested as part of our big 2026 gravel wheel group test you can find an overview of all the wheels on test here.All wheels on test: CADEX Max GXR | DT Swiss GRC 1100 DICUT 50 | ENVE G SES 6.7 Pro | Fulcrum Sharq GR | HUNT 5AM Gravel Limitless Ti_UD | Leeze CH 60 PRO GX | Light Bicycle AG48 | NEWMEN Streem G.62 CS | OQUO RP50LTD CS | Reserve 48|53 GR | Roval Terra Aero CLX | Vision SC 45 i30 | Zipp 303 XPLR SWDer Beitrag NEWMEN Streem G.62 CS Gravel Wheelset on Test erschien zuerst auf GRAN FONDO Cycling Magazine.

Stiff, direct and versatile, the RP50 LTD CS sees OQUO bring a road wheelset to gravel, with Mini-Hook rims that accommodate wider tires. Carbon spokes and hubs developed in the Basque Country promise road bike sharpness on almost any surface. The question is whether that road racing pedigree can hold its own in our big gravel wheel group test.This wheelset was tested as part of our big 2026 gravel wheel group test you can find an overview of all the wheels on test here.OQUO RP50 LTD CS | 1,380 g | 2,999 | Manufacturer websiteOQUO are Orbeas wheel brand, based in the Spanish Basque Country, where they develop and manufacture their own hubs. The name leaves no doubt about the RP50 LTD CSs origins: RP stands for Road Performance. Conceived as an all-road wheelset for tarmac and fast gravel alike, it has also been available since March 2026 in a CS version with carbon spokes. In a field of purpose-built gravel racing wheelsets, its the only one with road roots. The question is whether that puts it on the back foot before the test has even begun.All-Road DNA The OQUO Carbon Gravel Wheelset in DetailOne look at the rims reveals the OQUOs road heritage. At 50 mm deep front and rear, with a 25 mm internal and 34 mm external width, theyre among the narrowest in the test. The Mini-Hook design accepts road tires at 6.5 to 7 bar as well as gravel tires up to around 50 mm. Our 45 mm Continental Competition control tire grows only to 45.5 mm at the front and 45.4 mm at the rear, overhanging the narrow rim walls noticeably, yet it handles exactly as it should. At 1,380 g on our scales, the OQUO is also one of the lighter wheelsets on test, an advantage that shows on the climbs.Mini-Hook The small bead hook accommodates high-pressure road tires as well as gravel tires up to around 50 mm.Narrow base With a 25 mm internal rim width, the gravel tire protrudes considerably beyond the rim.Carbon blades The 20 Vonoa carbon spokes per wheel make the OQUO exceptionally stiff.Each wheel uses 20 Vonoa carbon spokes, laced to OQUOs own Q10 hubs, which are developed and manufactured entirely in the Basque Country. Inside, a SharkRatchet mechanism provides 45 points of engagement, while specially developed stainless steel bearings are, according to OQUO, more durable and smoother than many ceramic alternatives. Distinctive rims and decals and hubs finished in blasted silver give the wheelset a look all its own. At 2,999, its among the more expensive options in the test, though OQUO softens the blow with a lifetime warranty.SharkRatchet The Q10 hub with 45 points of engagement is developed and manufactured entirely in the Basque Country.Matte and understated Matte carbon and subtle decals combine with hubs finished in blasted silver.Road Racing on Gravel The OQUO RP50 LTD CS on TestOut on our test route, the OQUO immediately reveals its intended purpose, delivering a well-rounded yet aggressive and direct ride that feels remarkably like a road bike on gravel. Acceleration is excellent, with the high stiffness translating every pedal stroke directly into forward momentum. The wheels shine on the climbs, where their low weight and responsiveness come into their own. For gravel use, they almost feel a little too stiff, but that fits their design philosophy. After all, the OQUO were originally developed for narrower tires.In corners, the OQUO are agile, direct and eager to change direction, making them particularly entertaining on tarmac and fast gravel. However, if stability and confidence are your main priorities, youll be better served by a dedicated gravel wheelset. Their road racing DNA becomes most apparent on trails. The stiff, narrow rims transmit impacts directly to the rider, demanding careful line choice. Unsurprisingly, the OQUO finish in the bottom third of the test field for comfort, with virtually every wheelset featuring conventional steel spokes or wider tire profiles offering a smoother ride. For their intended all-road purpose, however, the OQUO do an excellent job.Narrow Equals Fast? The OQUO RP50 LTD CS in the Wind TunnelThe OQUO feels like genuine racing wheelset, both on tarmac and fast gravel. But how aerodynamic are the relatively narrow road rims? Subjectively, they deliver a solid mid-pack performance. The wheels are fun to ride, but with wide gravel tires fitted, the rims arent particularly wide or deep enough to create a convincing aerodynamic sensation. The wind tunnel paints a slightly better picture. With a rider on board at 36 km/h, the OQUO wheelset requires 1.7 W less power than our reference wheelset, the DT Swiss GRC 1100. That translates to a 12.3-second advantage over 40 km, although the result remains within the measurement tolerance of 4.3 W. The tire may help explain the result. We always measure the wheel and tire as a complete system, and on the 25 mm internal rim width, the Continental Competition retains a compact 45.5 mm profile.Conclusions about the OQUO RP50 LTD CSJudge the OQUO RP50 LTD CS as what it is, an all-road wheelset rather than a purebred gravel racer, and it makes a compelling case. On tarmac and fast gravel, it delivers road racing performance in full, with explosive acceleration, high stiffness and direct handling that come into their own on climbs. Rough terrain exposes its limits, as comfort and composure fall short. For riders who want one carbon wheelset to cover both road and gravel, the OQUO is a convincing choice at 2,999, backed by a lifetime warranty.TopsExplosive acceleration, particularly strong on climbsDirect, agile handlingVersatile on road and gravel thanks to Mini-Hook rimsLifetime warrantyFlopsLimited comfort on rough terrainUnsettled handling on trailsMore information at oquowheels.com.The Test FieldThis wheelset was tested as part of our big 2026 gravel wheel group test you can find an overview of all the wheels on test here.All wheels on test: CADEX Max GXR | DT Swiss GRC 1100 DICUT 50 | ENVE G SES 6.7 Pro | Fulcrum Sharq GR | HUNT 5AM Gravel Limitless Ti_UD | Leeze CH 60 PRO GX | Light Bicycle AG48 | NEWMEN Streem G.62 CS | OQUO RP50LTD CS | Reserve 48|53 GR | Roval Terra Aero CLX | Vision SC 45 i30 | Zipp 303 XPLR SWDer Beitrag OQUO RP50 LTD CS Gravel Wheelset on Test erschien zuerst auf GRAN FONDO Cycling Magazine.

Deep-section rims, wide profiles and noisy freehubs: aero has come to gravel, bringing a wave of watt-saving claims with it. To separate fact from marketing, we rode 13 carbon gravel wheelsets on our test loop and took them to a Belgian wind tunnel. Our big 2026 gravel wheel group test reveals where riding impressions and hard data agree, where they dont, and which wheelset offers the best of both worlds.Aerodynamics are invisible, stiffness cant be judged with your fingertips and composure doesnt show up on the scales. Still, you know instantly when a wheelset feels right. You know it when you stand up on a climb and the bike leaps forward, and when the wheels track calmly through a carpet of roots as the bike moves beneath you. And you know it in that unmistakable sense of speed that comes with deep-section rims, whether the stopwatch agrees or not.Few components shape the character of a gravel bike quite like the wheels, and few upgrades are as expensive. With our big 2026 gravel wheel group test, we wanted to find out whats left once you strip away all the marketing hype. To do that, weve tested 13 wheelsets both on our test loop and in the wind tunnel, combining hard data with plenty of kilometres on gravel to establish which carbon gravel wheels really come out on top. If youre looking for fast wheels for the road instead, check out our road bike wheel group test.Table of contensWhy Aero Has Trickled Down to GravelWhy a wheelset changes your gravel bike more than most other upgradesThe best carbon gravel wheels at a glanceWhat makes the perfect gravel wheelset?Black Forest gravel and root-strewn trails: the best gravel wheels on test36 instead of 45 km/h: testing gravel wheels in the wind tunnelThe results: which are the best carbon gravel wheels of 2026?What should you know about gravel wheels? 8 lessons weve learned from testing 13 wheelsetsBest gravel wheels: test winner and Best BuyAll the other gravel wheelsets on testTops & FlopsConclusionsWhy Aero Has Trickled Down to GravelAs gravel racing has boomed, aerodynamics have followed it onto the dirt. Tires keep getting wider, and rims have had to grow with them to form an efficient aerodynamic system with tires of 45 mm and up. Wheelsets are expected to be faster and lighter, too, and a true performance all-rounder must be as convincing on race day as on a long weekend ride. Two years after our road wheel group test, it was time to see what the gravel market has to offer.Theres certainly no shortage of choice. Every manufacturer promises the fastest rim, the best ride quality and the cleverest design. Some go all in on rims up to 67 mm deep, while others favour mullet setups with different rim depths front and rear. Hooked and hookless rims are still competing for supremacy, and spoke materials split the field almost down the middle: six manufacturers use carbon or composite spokes, while seven stick with steel. The result is a market awash with promises of weight savings and aerodynamic gains, with so many different concepts that its easy to lose sight of what really matters. Thats exactly where our big group test comes in.Why a wheelset changes your gravel bike more than most other upgradesTires, drivetrains and cockpits get plenty of attention in the gravel scene. Apart from tires, few components influence how a bike rides as much as its wheels.. They determine how fast your bike accelerates, how smoothly it rolls over roots and how much comfort you actually feel in the saddle. And if youre upgrading from the budget OEM aluminium wheels fitted to many complete bikes, a modern carbon wheelset can work wonders. Of course, that transformation comes at a price. Prices for the wheelsets in this test range from 993.64 to 3,899, with an average of around 2,470. That makes carbon gravel wheels one of the most expensive upgrades you can make.Interestingly, the biggest differences dont necessarily show up in the wind tunnel, but out on the trail. Theres a 306 g gap between the lightest and heaviest wheelsets on test, something you feel on every climb and every time you accelerate. Depending on the rim, the same nominally 45 mm Continental Terra Competition tire can measure up to 4.6 mm wider, affecting comfort and grip and potentially pushing your frames tire clearance to its limits. In the wind tunnel, the fastest wheelset saves 5.0 W over our reference, equivalent to just over half a minute across 40 km at 36 km/h. Theres plenty of variation, then, and a highly competitive field. So which wheelsets are going head-to-head?The best carbon gravel wheels at a glanceBrandModelRim depth front/rear (mm)External rim width front (mm)External rim width rear (mm)Internal rim width (mm)Spoke materialRim beadPriceCADEXMax GXR50/50353525CarbonHookless3,799DT SwissGRC 1100 DICUT 5050/5036.536.524SteelHooked2,499ENVEG SES 6.7 Pro60/6742.642.635SteelHookless3,899FulcrumSharq GR47 to 52 (wave)363630SteelMini-Hook1,990HUNT5AM Gravel Limitless Ti_UD54/49453827CarbonHookless3,299LeezeCH 60 PRO GX60/60353528CarbonHookless1,599Light BicycleAG4848/48404035SteelHybrid Hook993.64 plus importNEWMENStreem G.62 CS62/62454527CarbonHooked1,690OQUORP50LTD CS50/50343425CarbonMini-Hook2,999Reserve48|53 GR48/53444430SteelHollow Hook2,799RovalTerra Aero CLX50/4538.538.527CompositeHooked3,498VisionSC 45 i3045/4538.538.530SteelHooked1,249Zipp303 XPLR SW54/54404032SteelHookless1,800Average28.82,470The test field brings together some of the biggest names in the wheel business. Carbon specialists like ENVE, CADEX and Roval line up alongside established players like DT Swiss, Zipp, Fulcrum and Vision, as well as German brands NEWMEN and Leeze. We also have Light Bicycle, a direct-import option from China, and OQUO, whose all-road wheelset is also approved for gravel use. Weve deliberately included uncompromising race wheels, versatile all-rounders and more affordable alternatives to make the test field as varied and relevant as possible. This means that brand-new 2026 models are going up against seasoned favourites such as the Zipp 303 XPLR SW.The range of rim designs is just as broad. Rim depths stretch from 45 mm on the Vision to 67 mm at the rear of the ENVE, while internal rim widths range from 24 mm on the DT Swiss to 35 mm on the ENVE and Light Bicycle. We tested every wheelset with the same 45 mm Continental Terra Competition tire. This gives us a consistent baseline and makes direct comparisons possible, even though Fulcrum and Vision only officially approve their rims for tires from 47 mm upwards, meaning theyre actually designed for wider rubber.The choice of tire was an obvious one: earlier this year, the Continental Terra Competition won our 2026 race gravel tire group test, beating 16 other race tires. It took the win as the most complete package: at 494 g its one of the few models under 500 g, its 11.1 W rolling resistance was the second-best figure in the test, and its puncture protection is above average. Its aero-optimised tread also makes it a natural partner for deep rims.One thing the test field makes very clear is that the number printed on your tires sidewall often has little to do with its actual width once mounted. Our nominally 45 mm tire measures anywhere between 44.8 and 49.4 mm, depending on the wheelset. Thats a difference of up to 4.6 mm purely down to the rim. A wider tire also tends to have a taller profile, so its worth checking your frames tire clearance before buying. Otherwise, your shiny new wheel upgrade might leave you with rather less room than expected.And rim dimensions arent the only area where manufacturers take different approaches. Six wheelsets rely on carbon spokes, while seven use steel. Rim bead designs cover everything from hookless to mini-hook, hollow-hook and hybrid-hook profiles, as well as conventional hooked rims. CADEX, ENVE, HUNT, Leeze and Zipp dispense with hooks altogether.Thats the technical overview sorted. But what actually makes a carbon gravel wheelset good?What makes the perfect gravel wheelset?Easy to ask, harder to answer. The classic reply is it depends, and in truth, we dont believe any single wheelset is perfect for everyone. What we can offer is a set of criteria weve applied to every contender. Whether you race, ride long days or simply want to have fun on gravel will decide which of them matter most to you.How comfortable is a carbon gravel wheelset?A wheelsets compliance plays a major role in determining what its best suited to. All-round and endurance-focused wheels generally offer more give and therefore more comfort than pure race wheels. Spokes play an important part here, and the manufacturers in our test have opted either for carbon, with its low weight and high stiffness, or steel, which can help ensure a more forgiving ride. The tire takes care of the rest. The wider it measures on the rim, the more air volume it provides to absorb impacts and improve comfort.How stiff should a gravel wheelset be?Stiffness and compliance often pull in opposite directions. A stiff wheelset reacts quickly to steering inputs and acceleration, turning your effort into immediate forward motion. But stiffness isnt down to a single component: hub, spokes and rim all have to work together. The rims carbon layup plays a key role, providing lateral stiffness while allowing controlled vertical flex.Which gravel wheels inspire the most confidence?The balance between compliance and stiffness has a big influence on how confident and secure you feel on a bike, although personal preference plays a major part. The stiffer the wheelset, the more precise the handling, but also the less forgiving it tends to be. Less experienced riders in particular may feel more confident on a wheelset with a more forgiving character. This becomes obvious especially on rooty trails and rough gravel, where a good gravel wheelset should hold its line calmly instead of transferring every impact straight into your wrists and demanding constant corrections.How aerodynamic are gravel wheels?You can get a feel for aerodynamics during a ride, even if you cant assess them as precisely as you can in a wind tunnel. The sail effect, in particular, is something you can notice out on the road or trail. The important thing is to remain objective, because the deepest rim isnt necessarily the fastest. Not every rim works equally well with every frame, either. Roval, for example, develop their Terra wheels in conjunction with Specializeds Crux frames. At 36 km/h, a realistic pace for fast gravel racing, aerodynamic differences shrink considerably compared with the road, where higher speeds magnify the gap in absolute watts.How Do Deep-Section Gravel Wheels Handle Crosswinds?The deeper the rim, the more susceptible it is to crosswinds. At least, thats the general rule of thumb. Some manufacturers try to counteract this with specially shaped rim profiles. Fulcrum, for example, use a wave-shaped design, while Roval opt for a flattened rim profile. After all, theres little fun in riding a wheelset that constantly demands steering corrections.How much should a gravel wheelset weigh?An all-rounder needs to climb well, too, so every wheelset in our test field underwent plenty of uphill kilometres. Weight and stiffness are the main factors determining how effortlessly the wheels accelerate. Weight is a useful starting point, but its not enough to judge a wheelset on its own. How lively a wheel feels depends just as much on how its overall construction is tuned.How well do gravel wheels maintain speed?In fast gravel sections, what matters most is how effectively a wheelset holds its speed and how easily you can accelerate further when youre already moving quickly. This is where deep-section rims come into their own. Once up to speed, they roll along confidently, with a noticeable sail effect. Smooth rolling characteristics and an appropriate rim width are also essential for maintaining momentum over rough surfaces.Black Forest gravel and root-strewn trails: the best gravel wheels on testWe didnt have to travel far for our test rides. In fact, we put the wheels through their paces right on our doorstep, in some of the most beautiful parts of the Black Forest. Fast, smooth champagne gravel alternates with rough, chunky surfaces, steep descents lead into rapid-fire trails, and in between youll find carpets of roots and twisting sections designed to unsettle even the most composed wheelset. In short, everything you need to push a gravel wheelset to its limits.Riding impressions meet hard data: how we testedWe assessed every wheelset in two ways: back-to-back on the trail and in the wind tunnel. Wind tunnel speed alone doesnt make a great gravel wheelset, so each contender also had to prove itself on the same test loop, ridden in conditions as consistent as possible. All 13 ran the same 45 mm Continental Terra Competition tire, set up tubeless with milKit sealant, with each tester adjusting pressure to their body weight and the measured tire width and recording it for every wheelset. That kept tire pressure from skewing our comparisons.Three testers, one test fleet: our crew and the test bikesNot all gravel riding is the same, so we brought together three riders with very different priorities. Jan takes a more laid-back approach. For him, gravel is all about enjoying the ride, and he loves anything thats fast, feels brilliant on the bike and looks the part. Benedikt, on the other hand, is a racer and high-mileage rider, a complete tech nerd and an aero obsessive who has even given himself the nickname Benaero. Hes only recently discovered gravel riding, but hes already attacking every corner as though the finishing sprint is just around the bend. Then theres Sara, who rides gravel purely for the fun of it and loves making the most of everything the Black Forest has to offer. Her approach is sporty, fast and firmly focused on enjoyment. As a professional mechanic, however, her ideal gravel wheelset needs to deliver more than outright speed. It has to impress from a technical perspective, too.Our test bikes came from across our gravel fleet, including the Ridley Kanzo Fast, Canyon Grail CF, ROSE Backroad FF and BMC Kaius. That gave us everything from aerodynamic gravel race machines to versatile all-rounders.36 instead of 45 km/h: testing gravel wheels in the wind tunnelOut on the trail, its virtually impossible to feel differences of just a few watts. Thats why every wheelset also had to face the wind tunnel. We conducted our measurements at the Aero Performance Lab in Bike Valley, Belgium, Ridleys in-house development facility. Fittingly, we used the Ridley Kanzo Fast 2.0 as our test platform, with the wheels spinning and a test speed of 36 km/h.Thats deliberately slower than the 45 km/h we used for our road bike wheel group test. After all, 36 km/h is much closer to the speeds you can realistically expect in gravel races. Every wheelset was fitted with the same 45 mm Continental Terra Competition tire, inflated to 2 bar. Each wheelset underwent two rounds of wind tunnel testing. The first was conducted with the bike alone, across 13 yaw angles ranging from 18 to +18. The second included a rider, with measurements taken at seven yaw angles between 12 and +12.We used the measurements with the rider for our final assessment. After all, theres always someone sitting on the bike, and a wheelset thats fast on its own may lose its aerodynamic advantage once a riders legs enter the equation. Even a small change in arm position could skew the results, so we also ran a simulation that recorded the riders position and compared it between runs. We used the DT Swiss GRC 1100 DICUT 50 as our reference wheelset, testing it repeatedly throughout the day to identify any variations in the wind tunnel measurements.Small differences at 36 km/h make context essential. With a rider on board, our measurement tolerance is 4.3 W, and the reference wheelset shows why. Measured three times with a rider, the DT Swiss produced three different results, spread across 0.9 W. Without a rider, the variation was far greater: across five separate installations, the same wheelset varied by as much as 4.0 W, which is why riderless results dont count toward our final assessment. Even so, the data gives a clear indication of how the wheelsets compare, and shows just how efficient modern performance wheels have become.The results: which are the best carbon gravel wheels of 2026?BrandModelMeasured weight (g)Measured tire width front (mm)Measured tire width rear (mm)Power vs. reference with rider (W)Time over 40 km (s)CADEXMax GXR1,30245451.611.5DT SwissGRC 1100 DICUT 501,60844.944.80.0 (reference)0ENVEG SES 6.7 Pro1,56048.849.40.64.6FulcrumSharq GR1,54347471.39.5HUNT5AM Gravel Limitless Ti_UD1,3354645.95.036.4LeezeCH 60 PRO GX1,32346.246.53.122.3Light BicycleAG481,48149491.17.6NEWMENStreem G.62 CS1,52646.246.10.10.9OQUORP50LTD CS1,38045.545.41.712.3Reserve48|53 GR1,42247.747.70.43.0RovalTerra Aero CLX1,34146.346.21.17.7VisionSC 45 i301,60546.546.62.316.5Zipp303 XPLR SW1,4244847.81.511.0Average1,45046.746.7The tire measurements alone reveal just how much influence a rim has on the shape of a tire. On the ENVE G SES 6.7 Pro, our nominally 45 mm Continental Terra Competition measures 48.8 mm at the front and 49.4 mm at the rear. On the Light Bicycle AG48, it stretches to a full 49 mm. The Zipp 303 XPLR SW and Reserve 48|53 GR also push the tires width to almost 48 mm. At the other end of the spectrum, the DT Swiss GRC 1100 DICUT 50, CADEX Max GXR and OQUO RP50LTD CS keep the tire much closer to its stated width, with measurements between 44.8 and 45.5 mm. If your frame only offers limited tire clearance, you might want to measure up before buying. The deepest rim isnt necessarily the fastest, and the fastest doesnt always feel that way.In terms of weight, theres a 306 g difference between the lightest and heaviest wheelsets on test. At just 1,302 g, the CADEX Max GXR is the lightest, closely followed by the Leeze CH 60 PRO GX at 1,323 g. Not far behind are the HUNT 5AM Gravel Limitless Ti_UD at 1,335 g and the Roval Terra Aero CLX at 1,341 g. At the heavier end sit the DT Swiss GRC 1100 DICUT 50 at 1,608 g and the brand-new Vision SC 45 i30 at 1,605 g. Interestingly, these two wheelsets and the Leeze all weighed between 33 and 63 g more on our scales than their manufacturers claim.BrandModelClaimed weight (g)Measured weight (g)DifferenceCADEXMax GXR1,3201,30218DT SwissGRC 1100 DICUT 501,5751,608-33ENVEG SES 6.7 Pro1,5801,56020FulcrumSharq GR1,5501,5437HUNT5AM Gravel Limitless Ti_UD1,3171,335-18LeezeCH 60 PRO GX1,2801,323-43Light BicycleAG48n/a1,481n/aNEWMENStreem G.62 CS1,5301,5264OQUORP50LTD CS1,3711,380-9Reserve48|53 GR1,4331,42211RovalTerra Aero CLX1,3401,341-1VisionSC 45 i301,5421,605-63Zipp303 XPLR SW1,4521,42428Average1,4411,450-7In the wind tunnel, only one wheelset establishes a measurable advantage. With a rider on board, the HUNT 5AM Gravel Limitless Ti_UD requires 5.0 W less than our reference wheelset, equivalent to a saving of 36.4 seconds over 40 km. Theyre the only wheels to exceed the 4.3 W measurement tolerance. The second-best result comes from the Leeze CH 60 PRO GX, which save 3.1 W, followed by the Vision SC 45 i30 at 2.3 W. The rest of the field ranges from 0.6 W slower to 1.7 W faster than the reference, forming a group in which no meaningful ranking can be established. Ironically, the deepest rims in this test end up towards the slower end of that group. The NEWMEN Streem G.62 CS, with their 62 mm rims, and the ENVE G SES 6.7 Pro, with 60 and 67 mm rims, require 0.1 and 0.6 W more than the reference, respectively. The fastest wheelset saves 5 watts. The right riding position saves 23.While we had a wind tunnel at our disposal, we also took the opportunity to answer a few questions that had been on our minds for a while. For a start, riding position makes a far bigger difference than your wheels. By switching from a normal race position to a more aerodynamic one, our test rider saved 23.0 W, almost five times as much as the fastest wheelset. Sitting upright in a more relaxed comfort position, meanwhile, increased the power requirement by 20.1 W.We also tested NEWMENs hidden aero valve. The result? Without a rider, the NEWMEN were actually 0.5 W slower with the concealed valve than with a conventional one.Out on the trail, however, the differences become considerably more obvious. When it comes to accelerating, nothing can touch the CADEX Max GXR. Theyre explosively fast off the mark and deliver an incredibly direct response. The OQUO RP50LTD CS, HUNT 5AM Gravel Limitless Ti_UD and Leeze CH 60 PRO GX follow closely behind.From a standstill, the ENVE G SES 6.7 Pro and Zipp 303 XPLR SW take their time, and the Fulcrum Sharq GR clearly lacks punch. The Vision SC 45 i30 is a pleasant surprise, accelerating eagerly and, despite its weight, proving particularly enjoyable on climbs. Comfort and trail performance shift the picture somewhat. The Roval Terra Aero CLX and Reserve 48|53 GR are impressively comfortable for wheelsets with such performance ambitions, and the Vision soaks up vibrations well too.On rough terrain, the ENVE G SES 6.7 Pro, HUNT 5AM Gravel Limitless Ti_UD, NEWMEN Streem G.62 CS and Reserve 48|53 GR all hold their line with reassuring composure. The stiff CADEX Max GXR and OQUO RP50LTD CS, along with the DT Swiss GRC 1100 DICUT 50, transmit impacts much more directly. Youll find all the details on each wheelset in the linked individual reviews. But if you just want to know which wheels came out on top, youll find our test winner and Best Buy recommendation further down.What should you know about gravel wheels? 8 lessons weve learned from testing 13 wheelsetsAfter putting 13 wheelsets through their paces on several test bikes and spending a long day in the wind tunnel, weve come away with a few insights that go well beyond the raw numbers.The biggest takeaway? A wheelset that shines in the wind tunnel but sends every root straight through your wrists on the trail simply isnt a good gravel wheelset.1. Do fast gravel wheels actually feel fast?Not necessarily. Your legs arent a wind tunnel, after all. Unlike in our 2024 road wheel group test, riding impressions and measured results often told very different stories this time. The NEWMEN feels like the fastest wheelset on test, yet its on a par with our reference in the wind tunnel. The Vision, by contrast, feels almost sluggish, despite requiring 2.3 W less. Thats because the sensation of speed is shaped primarily by stiffness, weight and acceleration. Wind tunnel conditions are also much further removed from the constantly changing surfaces of gravel riding than from road cycling.2. Why is the front rim deeper than the rear?Roval and HUNT both use deeper rims at the front than at the rear. Their reasoning is that the front wheel runs through relatively undisturbed air and therefore has a greater influence on aerodynamics. ENVE and Reserve take exactly the opposite approach, although the results certainly suggest that HUNT are onto something. Fulcrum, meanwhile, have developed a different solution with their wave-shaped rim profile, designed to combine aerodynamic efficiency with crosswind stability.3. Are carbon spokes uncomfortable on a gravel bike?Not necessarily. Despite using carbon spokes, the Roval and HUNT wheelsets both offer noticeably well-tuned comfort. CADEX, OQUO and NEWMEN demonstrate the other side of the equation, while Reserve and ENVE prove that a performance wheelset with steel spokes can be impressively comfortable. Ultimately, its the overall tuning that matters, not just the spoke material.4. Is a lighter gravel wheelset always better?The scales only tell part of the story. The Vision accelerates far more eagerly than its 1,605 g weight would suggest, while the Zipp feels heavier than its 1,424 g weight suggests. So how lively a wheelset feels depends at least as much on its stiffness and overall construction as it does on weight.5. Which rims work best with which gravel tires?In the wind tunnel, the rim and tire always work together as a system. The HUNT front rim sits almost flush with the tire and is the only one to deliver a measurable aerodynamic advantage. The NEWMEN have the same external rim width but perform on a par with our reference, while the narrower Leeze achieve the second-best result, albeit within the measurement tolerance. The lesson? Never consider the rim without thinking about the tire youll be running.6. Does a good gravel wheelset have to be expensive?Well, the expensive HUNT take the overall win. But NEWMEN and Leeze also deliver excellent results for around half the price, while the most expensive wheelset on test goes home empty-handed. So you dont necessarily have to spend a fortune to get serious performance.7. Hookless or hooked rims for gravel?At typical gravel tire pressures, the distinction isnt particularly critical. The maximum approved pressures for the wheels on test range from 3.4 to 5.5 bar. Tire compatibility is another matter, though. Hookless rims require tires that are specifically approved for hookless use. If you want to keep your tire options open, hooked rims are the safer bet.8. Do deep-section rims make sense on a gravel bike?Absolutely! Deep-section rims are a lot of fun on gravel, too. We kept setting personal bests on the NEWMEN with their 62 mm rims, while the ENVE, with their 60 and 67 mm profiles, maintained speed over rough terrain as though they were running on rails. And lets not forget that deep-section rims look pretty damn good, too.Best gravel wheels: test winner and Best BuyAt the end of our test, two wheelsets stand clearly above the rest. One because it offers the most complete package, without any real weaknesses, and is the only contender to demonstrate a measurable advantage in the wind tunnel. The other because it performs so brilliantly across every type of terrain that we were reluctant to give it back.Best in test: HUNT 5AM Gravel Limitless Ti_UDWith the 5AM Gravel Limitless Ti_UD, British brand HUNT have built the most complete wheelset in the entire test. Low weight, high stiffness and explosive acceleration combine with confident handling through corners and on trails, along with well-judged comfort despite the carbon spokes. To top it all off, the HUNT is the only wheelset to show a measurable aerodynamic advantage over our reference in the wind tunnel. At 3,299, or 2,899 with stainless steel bearings, our test winner is the one to beat.Best Buy: Reserve 48|53 GRBalance is the Reserve 48|53 GRs greatest asset. Its handling is equally convincing on gravel, trails and tarmac, it holds high speeds with ease and inspires huge confidence through corners, and its remarkably comfortable for a performance-focused wheelset. Hollow Hook rims offer broad tire compatibility, and DT Swiss 180 hubs add proven reliability. At 2,799, its as well suited to racing as to everyday riding, and, like the Reserve 52|63 in 2024, its a deserving winner of our Best Buy award.All the other gravel wheelsets on testTheres plenty to like beyond our award winners, too. Heres a quick rundown of all the other wheelsets in the test. Youll find the full details in their individual reviews, linked below.CADEX Max GXRThe CADEX are the sprinters of the group and, at just 1,302 g, the lightest wheels on test. On smooth gravel and tarmac, they accelerate explosively and deliver an incredibly direct response. On rougher terrain, however, they lack compliance and composure. At 3,799, theyre an uncompromising racing tool for fast events on smooth surfaces.DT Swiss GRC 1100 DICUT 50The DT Swiss impress with balanced, predictable handling and surprisingly lively acceleration. On rough trails, however, they feel harsh, and at 1,608 g, theyre the heaviest wheelset on test. For 2,499, you get a dependable set of wheels that never misses a beat.ENVE G SES 6.7 ProAt 3,899, the ENVE are the most expensive wheels on test, bringing road racing aero DNA to gravel with their 60 and 67 mm deep rims. On fast, rough tracks, they deliver outstanding control and plenty of comfort. Accelerating from a standstill, however, they lack punch. And in the wind tunnel, the aerodynamic advantage wed hoped for simply doesnt materialise.Fulcrum Sharq GRWith their distinctive wave-shaped rim profile, the Fulcrum stand out from the competition both visually and technically, while showing no aerodynamic disadvantage in the wind tunnel. However, when paired with 45 mm tires, they lack directness, lively acceleration and comfort out on the trail. At 1,990, theyre an excellent choice if youre planning to run tires measuring 47 mm or wider.Leeze CH 60 PRO GXThe Leeze is a thoroughly accomplished race wheelset, combining a low weight of just 1,323 g with powerful acceleration and a ride feel thats surprisingly close to a road bike. It also records the second-best result in the wind tunnel. The only thing keeping it from an award is the lack of a truly standout feature. But at 1,599, its very hard to fault.Light Bicycle AG48The Light Bicycle AG48 is the budget racer of the group, offering plenty of performance thanks to its high stiffness, punchy acceleration and generous 35 mm internal rim width. The compromises come in comfort and handling on rough trails. And while the headline price of 993.64 looks tempting, buying direct means adding shipping, import VAT and customs duties.NEWMEN Streem G.62 CSThe NEWMEN are true race wheels, and with their 62 mm deep rims, they feel like the fastest wheelset on test, even if the wind tunnel tells a rather different story. Their handling hits the sweet spot for gravel riding, although youll have to accept some compromises in compliance. At 1,690, they deliver pure performance, made in Germany.OQUO RP50LTD CSThe OQUO are actually an all-road wheelset thats also approved for gravel use. On tarmac and fast gravel, they deliver a genuine road bike feel, with explosive acceleration. Once the terrain gets rough, however, they lack comfort and composure. At 2,999, theyre a versatile option for anyone who also wants to use the same wheels on their road bike.Roval Terra Aero CLXThe Roval are the all-rounders in our test field, performing equally well on tarmac, gravel and trails. They weigh just 1,341 g and offer plenty of comfort despite their composite spokes. Other wheelsets accelerate more eagerly, though, and at 3,498, theyre among the more expensive contenders.Vision SC 45 i30The Vision is the surprise package of the test. Despite weighing 1,605 g, it accelerates with remarkable ease, climbs well and delivers plenty of comfort. The wide rims will probably only reveal their full potential when paired with tires measuring 50 mm or more. At 1,249, it offers far more performance than its price might suggest.Zipp 303 XPLR SWAs the tests seasoned veteran, the Zipp 303 XPLR SW offers calm, confidence-inspiring handling across a wide range of gravel. Newer designs have overtaken it on acceleration and directness, but 1,800 still buys a dependable, fuss-free wheelset, backed by a lifetime warranty that covers riding damage as well as manufacturing defects.Tops & FlopsTopsDespite their performance ambitions, the Roval and Reserve offer plenty of comfort, making them excellent wheels for everyday riding, too.DT Swiss, Reserve and Roval all use DT Swisss proven, easy-to-service Ratchet EXP freehub system.Considering their weight and age, the DT Swiss GRC 1100 DICUT 50 performs surprisingly well, both on the trail and in the wind tunnel.Vision, NEWMEN and Leeze offer plenty of carbon wheel for your money, as do Light Bicycle if youre prepared to deal with the extra hassle of importing.HUNT replace crash-damaged wheels free of charge for the original owner throughout their lifetime, while ENVE offer the same protection for the first three years.FlopsNEWMENs hidden aero valve offers no measurable advantage and only makes everyday life more complicated.At 67 mm deep, the ENVE rear rim isnt UCI-compliant.With Light Bicycle, you need to factor in shipping, import VAT and customs duties. Warranty claims are also handled directly through China or the EU shop.Fulcrums AFS disc rotor interface requires a dedicated lockring.The silver spoke nipples spoil the otherwise clean, beautiful look of the Roval.The OQUO are the only wheels on test optimised specifically for road tires.ConclusionsAfter putting 13 wheelsets through the wringer, the picture is surprisingly clear. Almost every contender has its strengths, and whether you want a dedicated race setup or a fast, dependable wheelset for everyday training, theres something here for you. There are clear winners and losers, though, and the gap between how wheels feel and how they measure surprised even us. One wheelset stands above the rest: the HUNT 5AM Gravel Limitless Ti_UD excels both on the trail and in the wind tunnel, earning our Best in Test award on merit. The Reserve 48|53 GR takes our Best Buy award and was among the wheelsets we most enjoyed riding. And if you still judge gravel wheels by rim depth alone after reading this, a day in the wind tunnel might change your mind.Der Beitrag The best carbon gravel wheels on test: 13 wheelsets in our big group test erschien zuerst auf GRAN FONDO Cycling Magazine.

Deep at the front, shallower at the rear and squared off where others are rounded, the Terra Aero CLX sees Roval rewrite the aero playbook twice over. The staggered rim depths reverse the usual approach, and the rims finish in a flat, chopped-off edge. Composite spokes, low weight and proven DT Swiss technology complete a package that aims to excel everywhere. The question is whether this unconventional formula can compete with the best in our big gravel wheel group test.This wheelset was tested as part of our big 2026 gravel wheel group test you can find an overview of all the wheels on test here.Roval Terra Aero CLX | 1,341 g | 3,498 | Manufacturer websiteAs Specializeds in-house wheel brand, Roval is a fixture in the professional road peloton and just as at home on gravel. The Terra Aero range carries the brands road racing aero expertise off-road, pairing an unusual flat-edged rim profile with a distinctive bead edge and composite spokes. In our first standalone review, the Terra Aero CLX won us over with its efficiency and comfort. This group test puts that verdict up against far stronger opposition.A Cut Above The Roval Carbon Gravel Wheelset in DetailThe rims make Rovals unconventional thinking clear at a glance. A 50 mm deep front and a 45 mm deep rear reverse the usual aero logic of a shallower front and deeper rear, while a flattened edge, which Roval calls its Chopped Aero Speed Shape, is claimed to deliver maximum aerodynamic efficiency at minimal weight. A 5.38 mm wide FlatStop rim edge adds protection against pinch flats. With an internal width of 27 mm and an external width of 38.5 mm, the rims grow our 45 mm Continental Competition control tire to 46.3 mm at the front and 46.2 mm at the rear. At 1,341 g on our scales, the Roval is also among the lightest wheelsets in the test.Turning things around With a 50 mm deep front rim and 45 mm rear, Roval reverse the conventional aero approach.Chop it! The flat-topped rim profile divides opinion, but it certainly gives the wheels a distinctive appearance.FlatStop The 5.38 mm wide, flattened rim edge is designed to protect against pinch flats.The spokes are just as unconventional. Roval use Arris aero composite spokes made from thermoplastic with titanium ends, 18 at the front and 24 at the rear, which they claim are stronger and lighter than steel. The hubs, by contrast, rely on proven DT Swiss internals, shared with the popular DT Swiss 180 with Ratchet EXP and SINC ceramic bearings, and the freehubs sound leaves no doubt about its origins. Black decals and black-chrome hubs keep the look understated, but the silver nipples jar with an otherwise clean finish. At 3,498, the Terra Aero CLX is the third most expensive wheelset in the test, yet it does little to look the part.Composite over steel The Arris thermoplastic composite spokes are designed to be stronger and lighter than conventional steel spokes.Black chrome Proven DT Swiss 180 technology is housed in an understated shell, with only the silver nipples disrupting the clean appearance.Everybodys Darling The Roval Terra Aero CLX on TestOn our test route, the Roval reveal themselves as genuine all-rounders, performing convincingly in virtually every situation without specialising in any particular discipline. Their stiffness is relatively moderate for wheels with composite spokes and feels almost perfectly matched to gravel riding. They cant match the explosive acceleration of the CADEX, but their lightweight spokes provide a welcome dose of liveliness when sprinting or climbing.Compliance is surprisingly good. For a composite-spoked wheelset, the Roval is pleasantly comfortable while retaining enough firmness for precise handling. In typical Roval fashion, it feels slightly more forgiving than many competitors, which works particularly well on rough terrain. In corners, the Roval steers precisely and progressively without feeling excessively direct or overly soft. On trails, it finds its line reliably while remaining responsive enough for confident steering and quick reactions. Ultimately, these are the wheels you barely mention after a ride, simply because everything worked exactly as it should.Two Tests Are Better Than One? The Roval Terra Aero CLX in the Wind TunnelOn the road, the Roval wheelset impresses with its balanced performance. But how does its unusual flat-edged rim profile fare in the wind tunnel? Subjectively, it feels fast and efficient, although we wouldnt place it at the very top of the field. Its rims are neither particularly deep nor especially wide relative to our test tires. We mounted the Roval twice in the wind tunnel and obtained two different results. With a rider on board at 36 km/h, one measurement showed it needing 0.8 W more than our reference wheelset, the DT Swiss GRC 1100, while the other showed a 1.1 W advantage. Over 40 km, that corresponds to a 5.4-second disadvantage or a 7.7-second advantage respectively. Both results fall within the measurement tolerance, but they lend some support to Rovals claim that the wheelset is optimized for real-world conditions, rider included.Conclusions about the Roval Terra Aero CLXVersatility is the Roval Terra Aero CLXs greatest strength. Its as convincing on tarmac as on gravel and trails, and while it doesnt excel in any single discipline, it rarely puts a foot wrong. Low weight pairs with surprising comfort for a wheelset with composite spokes, and the unconventional rims prove their worth technically. If outright acceleration is your priority, there are more explosive options. For 3,498, however, the Roval delivers a wheelset you can trust on almost any ride, backed by a lifetime warranty.TopsBalanced handling for almost every type of ridingLow weightPlenty of comfort despite composite spokesCleverly designed rim detailsFlopsRims not particularly wide for modern gravel tyresSilver nipples spoil the clean appearanceMore information at specialized.com.The Test FieldThis wheelset was tested as part of our big 2026 gravel wheel group test you can find an overview of all the wheels on test here.All wheels on test: CADEX Max GXR | DT Swiss GRC 1100 DICUT 50 | ENVE G SES 6.7 Pro | Fulcrum Sharq GR | HUNT 5AM Gravel Limitless Ti_UD | Leeze CH 60 PRO GX | Light Bicycle AG48 | NEWMEN Streem G.62 CS | OQUO RP50LTD CS | Reserve 48|53 GR | Roval Terra Aero CLX | Vision SC 45 i30 | Zipp 303 XPLR SWDer Beitrag Roval Terra Aero CLX Gravel Wheelset on Test erschien zuerst auf GRAN FONDO Cycling Magazine.

Affordable, wide and underrated, the SC 45 i30 sees Vision put width ahead of weight in a competitively priced gravel wheelset. Hooked rims built for generous tire widths and proven hub technology promise strong performance at a modest price. The question is whether such an understated package can hold its own in our big gravel wheel group test.This wheelset was tested as part of our big 2026 gravel wheel group test you can find an overview of all the wheels on test here.Vision SC 45 i30 | 1,605 g | 1,249 | Manufacturer websiteBest known on the road for their Metron aero wheels, Vision are part of component manufacturer FSA. In September 2026, they added the affordable SC 45 i30 gravel racing wheelset to their range, and it already has a strong result to its name: Marius Rren rode it to fourth place over 200 km at The Rift in Iceland.The design clearly prioritizes width over low weight, targeting riders who favor particularly wide tires. On paper, the relatively shallow rims and conventional steel spokes make the Vision look rather unremarkable. Out on the course, however, it reveals an entirely different character.Budget Beater! The Vision Carbon Gravel Wheelset in DetailThe SC 45 i30 makes Visions priorities clear on the scales, weighing in at 1,605 g and ranking among the heaviest wheelset in this test. Both rims are 45 mm deep, which makes them shallower than most competitors. However, with a 30 mm internal width and 38.5 mm external width, theyre exceptionally wide.Vision have designed the rims for tires of at least 50 mm, while ETRTO compatibility stretches from 47 all the way to 71 mm! Our 45 mm Continental Competition control tire measures 46.5 mm at the front and 46.6 mm at the rear, retaining a nicely rounded profile and behaving exactly as youd expect. The tyre is secured by a conventional hooked rim.Keeping it shallow At 45 mm deep front and rear, the Vision rims are shallower than almost every other wheelset in this test field.Room for more The wide rims are designed to deliver their full potential with tires measuring at least 50 mm.Hooked The conventional hooked rims offer plenty of freedom when choosing tires.Vision forgo carbon spokes in favour of bladed steel, using 21 at the front and 24 at the rear in a 2:1 lacing pattern. Wed have liked to see carbon spokes here, but the V-200 hubs are much more convincing. They feature high flanges, a three-pawl freehub mechanism and six sealed cartridge bearings. The freehub produces a satisfying, relatively subdued sound.Visually, the Vision is clean and understated, with the distinctive high-flange hubs providing a welcome highlight. At 1,249, its among the cheapest wheelsets in this test, making carbon rims accessible for comparatively little money.High flange The V-200 hubs are the visual highlight, producing a rich, satisfying sound without being particularly loud.Steel in the wind Bladed steel spokes in a 2:1 lacing pattern are intended to improve aerodynamic performance.Understated Performance The Vision SC 45 i30 on TestThe Vision quickly proves that it feels considerably lighter than its weight suggests. It accelerates surprisingly easily, is genuinely fun to ride and climbs better than expected. Stiffness is good, although it sits in the middle of the test field. That actually suits the Visions uncomplicated, well-rounded character rather nicely.Comfort is where the Vision shines. Its steel spokes and relatively shallow rims deliver noticeable compliance, soaking up impacts and smoothing out rough surfaces, although the ENVE goes further, with rims that spread the tire significantly wider. That comparison comes with a caveat: Vision designed these rims for tires of 50 mm and up, while we tested every wheelset on the same nominally 45 mm tires. Through corners, the Vision steers predictably and directly, and on the trail, its a lot of fun. Nothing it does is spectacular, but almost everything it does is good.Underrated? The Vision SC 45 i30 in the Wind TunnelThe Vision certainly delivers on fun and comfort, but how efficient are its relatively shallow rims in the wind? Subjectively, not particularly. Themodest rim depth means it feel especially aerodynamic, and compared with the competition, the Vision seems to offer little in terms of aerodynamic efficiency. The wind tunnel, however, tells a very different story. With a rider on board at 36 km/h, the Vision requires 2.3 W less power than our reference wheelset, the DT Swiss GRC 1100. That equates to a 16.5-second advantage over 40 km. The tire may help explain the result. We always measure the wheel and tire as a complete system, and at 46.5 mm wide, the Continental Competition has a comparatively compact profile on the Vision rims.Conclusions about the Vision SC 45 i30Unremarkable on paper, entertaining on the course: the Vision SC 45 i30 is the surprise package of our test. It accelerates more freely than its weight would suggest, climbs well, rides comfortably and gives nothing away in the wind tunnel. Weight is its main weakness, and the rims need tires of 50 mm or wider to show their best. But for wide-tire riders who prioritize fun, the Vision delivers far more than its 1,249 price tag implies.TopsSurprisingly lively accelerationExcellent comfortPredictable, enjoyable handlingExcellent value for moneyFlopsHigh weightFull rim potential requires wider tyresMore information at visiontechusa.com.The Test FieldThis wheelset was tested as part of our big 2026 gravel wheel group test you can find an overview of all the wheels on test here.All wheels on test: CADEX Max GXR | DT Swiss GRC 1100 DICUT 50 | ENVE G SES 6.7 Pro | Fulcrum Sharq GR | HUNT 5AM Gravel Limitless Ti_UD | Leeze CH 60 PRO GX | Light Bicycle AG48 | NEWMEN Streem G.62 CS | OQUO RP50LTD CS | Reserve 48|53 GR | Roval Terra Aero CLX | Vision SC 45 i30 | Zipp 303 XPLR SWDer Beitrag Vision SC 45 i30 Gravel Wheelset on Test erschien zuerst auf GRAN FONDO Cycling Magazine.