I thought we were over indoor riding season, but this Peloton deal in the Amazon Spring Deal Days sale has really caught my eye, now at one of its lowest prices ever

The 2026 edition of Paris-Nice will be taking place from the 8th to the 15th of March and is, as every year, one of the key pro cycling events of the spring. It features opportunities for the climbers, sprinters and classics specialists alike. We preview stage 5, which is estimated to start and fini...

Weather conditions brought two key factors into the third stage of Tirreno-Adriatico and the fourth stage of ParisNice. Forecasts warned of heavy rain and strong crosswinds, putting the pelotons in both races on high alert from the very start. Chaos erupted very early in the French race, where the...

Theres a moment on a hot climb when you realize just how good, or how bad, a helmet is at keeping you cool. The pace drops, the airflow slows to a trickle, and suddenly every gram and every vent starts to matter. The same goes for moisture management; nothing is worse than looking down at your headunit only to have a wave of sweat obscure the screen, or worse, rearrange it. Thats exactly the scenario ABUS had in mind when designing the new AirBreaker 2.0, a helmet aimed squarely at riders who prioritize cooling, weight savings, and comfort without sacrificing aerodynamic efficiency.(Photo: Jordan Villella)ABUS introduced the AirBreaker line several years ago as its flagship ventilation-focused road helmet, famously worn by Alejandro Valverde during his 2018 World Championship victory. Now the brand has returned with a completely updated version developed alongside the Movistar Teams mens and womens squads.While the GameChanger series has been ABUSs aero benchmark in the pro peloton, the AirBreaker 2.0 is designed to occupy a slightly different place in the lineup, but not just the climbing helmet. Its a helmet for riders who want maximum airflow and comfort.After spending time riding in the AirBreaker 2.0, its clear ABUS didnt just tweak the original; they refined it in ways that make it noticeably more modern, comfortable, and better suited to multi-cyclists.A Helmet Built for Speed and Comfort Road racing and headwear have changed a lot over the past decade. Riders are spending more time in aero positions, shoving off comfort for pure speed. The aero helmet is now the default for most riders, but even those lids are getting more vents while staying true to their fast ethos. ABUS approached the AirBreaker 2.0 with those realities in mind.However, the new AirBreaker 2.0 is first and foremost about racing or riding fast in comfort. The helmet uses Forced Air Cooling Technology, built around seven internal air channels that move air from front to back. The front of the helmet features Eyebrow Vents, which sit just above the riders forehead and help direct airflow around the headband. No, youre not gonna look like Eugine Levy (from one of my fav shows, Schitts Creek fame). The new vents are a detail that may seem small, but makes a noticeable difference once the ride heats up.Longer Vents The top vents are longer and more open than before, helping push air across the scalp even at slower climbing speeds (think MTB). A large central vent behind the front intake works particularly well when paired with todays oversized cycling sunglasses. There is zero sunglass interference with the AirBreaker 2.0, even when paired with the mega-sized 100% MTB glasses.In other words, the AirBreaker 2.0 isnt just designed for airflow when youre blasting along at 30 mph; most helmets can do that. Its meant to keep your head cool when the road gets steep, and the wind drops.Lightweight, Breezy, and ComfortableThe first thing you notice when picking up the AirBreaker 2.0 is just how light it feels.ABUS lists the weight at 235 grams for size small, 245 grams for medium, and 270 grams for large in the non-MIPS version. Our medium came in at a solid 246g, one gram shy of the listed weight. Its not the lightest on the market, but its in the middle of the bell curve. Plus, sometimes the lightest helmets can fit terribly. numbers put it firmly in the lightweight performance category, and on the bike, the helmet essentially disappears.(Photo: Nino Villella)Ive been riding my ABUS Gamechanger 2.0 aero helmet lately. One of its slight drawbacks (some heat retention) is a bonus for the winter training miles. So, when I broke the seal and went riding in the AirBreaker 2.0, the first thing I noticed was that the helmet feels incredibly airy. Im not used to feeling my hair move when I turn my head in my go-to helmets.Even at moderate speeds, the airflow through the helmet is noticeable, and on long climbs or in the forest with minimal wind, the ventilation really shines. You can feel air moving across the scalp rather than just hitting the front vents and disappearing.Despite that open design, the helmet never feels flimsy or overly exposed. There is a reason, however, ABUS integrated an Injected Carbon Grid AeroBlade across the top of the helmet, which reinforces the structure and also works as a subtle aerodynamic element. The result is a helmet that feels both extremely light and structurally solid.Pardon the ride selfie but this is the best way to capture what the wind sees.and my grey hair in the wind. (Photo: Jordan Villella)Surprisingly Quiet in the WindOne thing I wasnt expecting from such a ventilated helmet was how quiet it is.Helmets with large vents often produce noticeable wind noise, especially when riding at speed or descending. The AirBreaker 2.0 manages to avoid that. Even on faster descents or long flat sections, the airflow across the helmet is smooth and controlled.Theres none of the turbulent rushing sound that some vent-heavy helmets produce. Instead, its a subdued whoosh, barely noticeable unless youre really paying attention. That quietness makes long rides feel calmer and less fatiguing, especially when riding solo for extended stretches.Flow Strap Pro The AirBreaker 2.0 uses the ABUS Flow Strap Pro system, which keeps the straps stable and flat against the face (although I managed to get a photo of the strap bunched up and not sitting flat against my face). Its a small detail, but the straps sit comfortably without twisting or rubbing, something that can become irritating on longer rides. Sometimes I have issues with non-movable straps not hitting the right spot on the ear, but ABUS fits me well.(Photo: Nino Villella)The Zoom Spin retention system at the rear provides easy micro-adjustments and works well for riders with longer hair thanks to its ponytail-friendly design. The cradle itself is soft and supportive without creating pressure points, and the overall internal shape feels natural. Once the helmet is adjusted correctly, it more or less disappears, always the sign of a well-designed fit system.You have to smile, especially when your kid asks if youre supposed to look angry in the photo. (Photo: Nino Villella)A More Modern LookABUS clearly paid attention to aesthetics with the AirBreaker 2.0. The helmet retains the recognizable AirBreaker DNA while introducing sharper lines and a slightly more aggressive profile inspired by the GameChanger series. The white-on-white with a pop of carbon is a killer look. Its modern and sticks out (especially when paired with white shoes), but not enough to cause weird looks on group rides.Compared to its predecessor, the silhouette looks sleeker and more purposeful. The central spine and AeroBlade element give the helmet a distinctive visual signature that separates it from more traditional vent-heavy helmets.Analysis Paralysis: AirBreaker 2.0 vs GameChanger 2.0For riders already familiar with ABUS helmets, the obvious comparison is the GameChanger 2.0, the brands aero-focused race helmet. The most annoying question that pops up when your favorite helmet manufacturer has a new lid is:Do I need that? As for a safety standpoint, if you crashed recentlyyes. But on a practical note, if you like to be the rider with the newest gear, having more helmets isnt a terrible problem.Ive spent several seasons riding with the GameChanger 2.0, and its been a reliable companion for fast rides and racing. But switching between the two helmets highlights their different personalities.The GameChanger 2.0 prioritizes aerodynamics first. Its design channels airflow tightly around the helmet and uses a more enclosed shell to minimize drag. Its the helmet you reach for on fast road races, time trials, or flat-out group rides.A Different ApproachThis helmet sacrifices a small amount of aerodynamic efficiency in favor of dramatically improved ventilation. On long climbs or hot summer rides, that difference is immediately noticeable.Weight is another factor. The AirBreaker feels lighter and more airy on the head, making it particularly appealing for mountainous terrain or extended endurance rides. Interestingly, despite its open design, the AirBreaker remains quieter in the wind than you might expectsometimes even quieter than the GameChanger, depending on riding position.And from a style standpoint, Ill admit something I didnt expect: I actually prefer the look of the AirBreaker 2.0.The GameChanger has always had a slightly bulky aero shape, and while its clearly designed for speed, its not always the most flattering helmet visually. The AirBreaker 2.0 looks sharper and more modern, with a cleaner profile that works well on a wider variety of bikes and riding styles. Call me vain, but for me, its simply the better-looking helmet. And now that Im getting older (slower) every year, I have to try and look cool on the bike, not just fast. Pricing and Availability ABUS AirBreaker 2.0 The AirBreaker 2.0 is offered in two versions:Standard version: $359.99 (Tested)MIPS version: $424.99The helmets are available in three sizes and multiple colorways, with production at ABUSs European facility in Italy.AirBreaker 2.0 Key Ride TakeawaysPretty much everything fit and experience-wise, Ive mentioned above, but I feel that I should sum it up for those who skim to the final thoughts of the reviews section. After several rides in the AirBreaker 2.0, its clear ABUS nailed the brief. I like this helmet, I like it a lot, not only for the road, but for gravel and mountain bike racing. I love a helmet that can go the distance, and overall, the disciplines that I love.The helmet is incredibly light, exceptionally well ventilated, and comfortable enough to forget youre wearing it. Sunglasses from various manufacturers fit easily in the vents and are sturdy enough not to fall out when you hit a pothole or shoot off your head while looking back to check on the group.The airflow through the vents is noticeable, and the helmet remains surprisingly quiet as speeds pick up. Compared to the GameChanger 2.0, the AirBreaker feels like the more versatile option, especially for riders who dont want an always-aero option.ABUS.comThe post ABUS AirBreaker 2.0 Helmet Review: More Versatile, Ventilated & Comfortable appeared first on Bikerumor.

Stage 4 of Paris-Nice is delivering the chaos that the first days have not had, however not for the positive reasons. The stage, hit very hard by strong rain and wind, saw plenty splits happen right from the start of the day. However splits were far from the most important moment of the afternoon, a...

With a new guard of gravel pros stepping onto the podium, here are a few riders and teams to get familiar with heading into the new season

More people are cycling, but a faster-built connected network is needed to step it up a gear. A few short projects in Dublin City Centre could add to a developing network, but Dublin City Council is using a scatter gun approach to route building. Comment & Analysis: Despite what the doubters think, survey after survey shows that most people in Ireland, including Dublin, want more cycle lanes.As covered on these pages recently, that still leaves a significant number of people who dont support investing in cycling a significant minority can seem very loud at times.And I can nearly hear somebody say: But all of my mates hate cycle lanes heres the thing, the data is from population-level representative surveys, so it can show that most people are supportive of something even if your circle of friends are all against it.The number of people cycling has grown in Dublin Census data shows it, traffic count data shows it, and it is very clearly happening when half-decent cycle tracks are built, such as on the Clontarf to City Centre Bus and Cycle route (pictured above).However, Dublin City Council is in a unique position to unlock cycling in its area and, in more than a few cases, to help neighbouring areas too. It has the highest cycling modal share in the State and controls most of the urban areas with the greatest cycling growth potential.There are layers and layers of complications here; Rome was not built in a day, and BusConnects routes will do some of the heavy lifting in terms of cycle routes into the city centre. etc, but the progress on cycle route building by the council continues to be painfully slow, and while some progress has been made, Dublin City Council continues to avoid making hard decisions and to connect disjoined bits of its cycle network.Two prime examples are the slowness in connecting the Clontarf route to the quays and the unwillingness to complete the Liffey Cycle Route to a reasonably high level of connectivity, safety, and comfort. This leaves two key routes, including the backbone along the quays, unfinished and unattractive to most people considering cycling even some of the time.The Liffey is only one of many examples of relatively short projects that are delayed or not yet considered, but that could have a high impact on making cycling more attractive for people who do not currently cycle or who limit the amount they cycle because of poor links in the network.Most people are not going to cycle when theres disjointed bits of cycle lanes here and there, as is the case now Are Dublin City Councils officials or councillors expecting otherwise? Why are they acting as if they do? If not, why is there not a greater focus on connecting the network before building routes elsewhere?After years of investment and debate, the city centre should at least have solid attempts at continuous north-south and east-west routes by now. Instead, Dublins only north-south cycle route that crosses the Liffey in both directions hardly extends beyond walking distance of the river on both sides, and it has no east-west route through the city centre.The only continuous route to/from even the inner suburbs to the core city centre is a combination of the cycle path along the quays from the Docklands to OConnell Bridge, where it abruptly starts/ends and is hard to access from the southside. Of course, that route in the Docklands links to the Royal Canal Greenway and the Grand Canal Way, but to get to the city centre, you need to use those routes as far as around the Convention Centre which is quite a detour for most.Even if it was deemed that the quays are untouchable for now, for whatever reason for now, theres so many options here.For example, the yellow links on this map (and some fixes on the green sections) would amount to around 2.5km of quick-build routes, which would at least start to join up areas of the city. All of the space required here is, for the most part, already planned to be given to cycling as part of BusConnects or other projects.Even in the case of North King Street, taking a traffic lane away will not take much away in terms of car capacity compared to what will be available once the BusConnects routes start to be built in the area. Most of the time, the two lanes are not even very effective at moving cars, and often one lane is taken up by ad hoc parking. Another obvious option away from BusConnects routes and other planned projects is the Werburgh St / Bride St / Heytesbury corridor. The council has already started work on the route, and given the low number of buses on it, it should now be a priority to upgrade and extend it as an active travel route.To be clear: Im not just adding the phrase active travel to be inclusive; as with most cycle path projects, pedestrian improvements are needed here too. Dublin is really missing a focus on network building, and that includes using more tools than just cycle paths. Such as using minor streets as quiet routes. Not for the sake of it, but because once traffic calming, filtering (where needed), and junction fixes are put in place, these types of routes can form important links. Including, for example, an east-west link off Bride Street to the route mentioned above in Marrowbone Lane (shown mainly in orange in the centre of the image below).Or the low-traffic routes in Portobello (shown in orange towards the bottom of the image) would link to the Rathmines Road and Harolds Cross. IrishCycle.com isnt mainly suggesting cycling here for climate reasons or for cleaner air or even for people to be healthier all of these are good reasons to give space to cycling. But the main reason here is accessibility and fairness keeping the city moving and keeping the promises to people.The Dublin City Centre Transport Plan cut off through routes for cars and promised not only to give priority to buses but also to support cycling as another alternative. Support for cycling has been very slow. The planned route on Gardner Street this year is to be welcomed, but it is far from enough. Then there is the construction of MetroLink and the BusConnects Core Route Corridors this will be a shock to the system in Dublin. Making other options safe and attractive as soon as possible is key to keeping the city moving while the works are ongoing throughout the coming decade. Dubliners should be mad that they dont have more safe and attractive cycle routes. If you want more, sadly, you need to fight for the city to keep its promises.

The fourth stage of Paris-Nice 2026 offered unique spectacle. Echelons, torrential rain, crashes and undulating slopes contributed to the general classification completely blowing up after three relatively calm days. That Jonas Vingegaard slipped into the overall lead does not come as a complete sur...

Unlike the exciting racing over in France, the Wednesday's stage of Tirreno-Adriatico passed rather quietly with parts of the stage neutralised due to safety concerns on wet descents. At the end of the rainy day, many sprinters have already found their matches soaked through and through, but not Dec...

The sport of cycling is becoming increasingly fast-paced in recent years. In practice, that means that power numbers that would've comfortably won you a Grand Tour a decade ago would not suffice even for a top-10 contender in 2026. On one side, that puts great expectations on the young talents comin...